Hello!
Makes sense calling it during every build, if it can be made reliably.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вт, 18 мая 2021 г. в 01:51, Данилов Семён :
> Hello, Igniters!
>
> I've recently stumbled across an issue where some tests can't be run
> locally due to the absence of some entries in "cl
Hello,
> However, for internal platform and services implementations we should fix the
> root cause:
> avoid extra deserialization->serialization pass completely.
> This will also improve performance.
Pavel, thanks for the feedback.
If I understand correctly, your suggestion is to know data siz
Hello!
Do I understand correctly that voting did not succeed due to insufficient
participation? Can you post the vote results?
I have checked examples and it indeed works.
I have a list of things to do before the RC4:
Please copy over examples directory and pom.xml to spring module 2.2.
There's
Hello!
Obvious issues are Lazy SQL, Event Driven Services, Sort Binary Object
Fields.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 19 мая 2021 г. в 12:56, Nikolay Izhikov :
> Hello,
>
> > However, for internal platform and services implementations we should
> fix the root cause:
> > avoid extra deserializ
Thanks, Ilya.
Can you put more context on this?
I don’t familiar with these issues.
> 19 мая 2021 г., в 13:02, Ilya Kasnacheev
> написал(а):
>
> Hello!
>
> Obvious issues are Lazy SQL, Event Driven Services, Sort Binary Object
> Fields.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> ср, 19 ма
Igniters.
Just to clarify the issue:
```
public class BinaryObjectTest extends GridCommonAbstractTest {
/** */
@Test
public void testArray() throws Exception {
Ignite ign = startGrid();
IgniteCache cache = ign.createCache("my-cache");
cache.put(1, new TestCla
Hello!
Yes, it does not look pretty, I agree. But I'm saying that I've not
encountered this issue on the user list before, and it can probably be
easily countered by storing some one-field ArrayWrapper object in the cache
as value.
Maybe we should just automate that, e.g., whenever user stores Ty
Hello!
I suggest that you may revert this change right away, and reopen the ticket.
Then patch author (Semyon) can take a look.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 17 мая 2021 г. в 14:16, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Folks,
>
> All tests passed successfully in the branch with reverted commit [1]:
>
> htt
Ilya,
> Maybe we should just automate that, e.g., whenever user stores Type[], always
> store one-field ArrayWrapper object, and automatically unwrap it on get()
Yes, I’m talking about this opportunity from the beginning of the thread.
> 1. Implement binary serialization that correctly Ser and
Hello!
Why do you need to take compatibility into account here at all?
You can start writing entries to cache in new format while reading both old
and new format.
I consider returning Object[] instead of ConcreteType[] a bug so it's
totally OK to start returning the "better" ConcreteType[] instea
Ilya.
Actually, current behaviour described even in documentation [1]
> Note that not all objects are converted to the binary object format. The
> following classes are never converted (e.g., the toBinary(Object) method
> returns the original object, and instances of these classes are stored
Hi,
The AggregateUnionTransposeRule attempts to push the Aggregate below the
Union.
Before:
Aggregate[group=$0, agg=SUM($1]
Union[all]
Input1
Input2
After:
Aggregate[group=$0, agg=SUM($1]
Union[all]
Aggregate[group=$0, agg=SUM($1]
Input1
Aggregate[group=$0, agg=SUM($1]
Folks,
Canceling due to insufficient
participation. The release source package and maven building will be
revisited. Spring examples will be copied to the Spring 2.2 module. I will
prepare RC4 after fixing issues.
Folks,
Canceling due to insufficient
participation. The release source package and maven building will be
revisited. I will prepare RC4 after fixing issues.
Hi Vladimir,
Looks like this message is for d...@calcite.apache.org, not
dev@ignite.apache.org,
or am I mistaken?
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM Vladimir Ozerov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The AggregateUnionTransposeRule attempts to push the Aggregate below the
> Union.
>
> Before:
> Aggregate[group=$0,
Hello, Ilya.
Thank you for feedback.
Yes, the vote was cancelled. I have published results.
I will create issues and prepare RC4 after fixing them.
ср, 19 мая 2021 г., 12:58 Ilya Kasnacheev :
> Hello!
>
> Do I understand correctly that voting did not succeed due to insufficient
> participation
Hello!
We don't have to do it in toBinary() - we may preserve its behavior if you
like, and only do that transition for Cache API, where additional support
may be added to
e.g.
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.binary.CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
ср, 19
Hi Pavel,
Yes, I missed the list, sorry.
ср, 19 мая 2021 г. в 14:40, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Looks like this message is for d...@calcite.apache.org, not
> dev@ignite.apache.org,
> or am I mistaken?
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:25 PM Vladimir Ozerov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Ag
Hi! The fix was merged yesterday and the JDBC driver suite
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_JdbcDriver?branch=%3Cdefault%3E&buildTypeTab=overview&mode=builds#all-projects
is stable again.
Semyon.
19.05.2021, 14:07, "Ilya Kasnacheev" :
> Hello!
>
> I suggest th
19 matches
Mail list logo
