Nikolay, i hope such case ignite users already observed)
I suggest to: put data bigger then available, full scan, get data only for
available inmem data in loop, check PageReplacement metric, how match
iterations will bring to zero this metric.
>Hello, Alex.
>
>> Perhaps we can implement
Ivan Bessonov created IGNITE-13743:
--
Summary: Defragmentation JMX API for schedule/cancel/status
Key: IGNITE-13743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13743
Project: Ignite
Iss
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-13744:
-
Summary: Use Table spool for IgniteNestedLoopJoin
Key: IGNITE-13744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13744
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Hello!
It seems that you were already assigned a Contributor role. Please try
assigning tickets to yourself.
Please read
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines
and familiarize yourself with https:/
Thanks, Ivan,
Another protocol for group membership worth checking out is RAPID [1] (a
recent one). Not sure though if there are any available implementations for
it already.
[1] https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-suresh.pdf
пн, 23 нояб. 2020 г. в 10:46, Ivan Daschinsky :
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New Critical Failure in master Thin client: Node.js
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_ThinClientNodeJs?branch=%3Cdefault%3E
No changes in the build
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New Critical Failure in master Thin client: Node.js
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_ThinClientNodeJs?branch=%3Cdefault%3E
No changes in the build
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-13745:
-
Summary: Add release notes for streaming extensions release 1.0.0
Key: IGNITE-13745
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13745
Project: Ignite
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New Critical Failure in master Thin client: Node.js
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_ThinClientNodeJs?branch=%3Cdefault%3E
No changes in the build
Hi Igniters,
I'd like to continue discussion of IEP-54 (Schema-first approach).
Hope everyone who is interested had a chance to get familiar with the
proposal [1].
Please, do not hesitate to ask questions and share your ideas.
I've prepared a prototype of serializer [2] for the data layout descr
Hello Amit,
Welcome to the community! Glad to see you are ready to contribute to Ignite.
Please check the "Code Contributions" and "Contributing to Ignite Core"
sections on this page: https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html
We put and grouped together some tasks that you might be inte
Dear Ignite Community,
I have uploaded a release candidate of the following extension modules:
ignite-camel-ext
ignite-flink-ext
ignite-flume-ext
ignite-jms11-ext
ignite-kafka-ext
ignite-mqtt-ext
ignite-pub-sub-ext
ignite-rocketmq-ext
ignite-storm-ext
ignite-twitter-ext
ignite-zeromq-ext
The foll
Igniters,
With this vote, I'd like to formally wrap up our discussion on defining
Ignite as a "distributed database" instead of an "in-memory computing"
platform. See the following discussion for the rationale and context:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Renaming-I
+1
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> With this vote, I'd like to formally wrap up our discussion on defining
> Ignite as a "distributed database" instead of an "in-memory computing"
> platform. See the following discussion for the rationale and context:
>
> http:
+1
Alex, could you please update Maven artifactIds and versions on the
documentation pages of the integrations? Commit to the master and
cherry-pick to ignite-2.9-docs, and I'll publish the changes to the website.
-
Denis
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:52 AM Alexey Goncharuk
wrote:
> Dear Ignite
Andrey, thanks for the update,
Does any of the serializers take into consideration the
native-image-generation feature of GraalVM?
https://www.graalvm.org/reference-manual/native-image/
With the current binary marshaller, we can't even generate a native image
for the code using our thin client AP
vkulichenko opened a new pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
+1
Denis, Alex
I have raised PR for the docs for Maven artifactIds and versions on the
documentation pages of the integrations.
PR : https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8488
Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12951
Please review and share if any further changes are required
+1
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > With this vote, I'd like to formally wrap up our discussion on defining
> > Ignite as a "distributed database" instea
vkulichenko commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/1#issuecomment-732547333
Test PR, will close.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
vkulichenko closed pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
Folks,
I went ahead and created the repository [1]. I also configured a TeamCity
project [2] that runs all available JUnit tests on every PR creation or
update. It also sends the status update to GitHub so that it's reflected in
the PR itself so that we can do merges directly from GitHub. Basic st
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-13746:
---
Summary: Document partition-aware data loading
Key: IGNITE-13746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13746
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Im
+1
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:25 AM Saikat Maitra
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > With this vote, I'd like to formally
24 matches
Mail list logo
