+1 On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:25 AM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > With this vote, I'd like to formally wrap up our discussion on defining > > > Ignite as a "distributed database" instead of an "in-memory computing" > > > platform. See the following discussion for the rationale and context: > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Renaming-Ignite-s-product-category-td49246.html > > > > > > If the vote passes, the website will define Ignite as "a distributed > > > database for in-memory speed at petabyte scale" to underscore our > > in-memory > > > origins (and the primary reason why the project is selected) but not > > > diminishing our persistence capabilities. All prominent use cases such > as > > > caching, high-performance computing, etc. will remain visible on the > > > website. There is nothing wrong if a distributed database is used as a > > > cache or high-performance compute cluster; it's up to an application > > > developer to decide. > > > > > > Overall, please cast your vote for defining Ignite as a "distributed > > > database": > > > +1 - support the change > > > -1 - disagree with the change, explain why > > > 0 - neutral > > > > > > This is a majority vote that is open for the next 7 days and to be > closed > > > on Monday, Nov 30th: > > > https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?year=2020&month=11&day=30 > > > > > > - > > > Denis > > > > > >
