Re: Java 9 support

Double checked scripts and found some errors. Corresponding JIRA issue [1] fixed and merged to 2.4 release branch. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7550 > On 26 Jan 2018, at 01:27, Denis Magda wrote: > > Pavel, it’s a good

Re: Java 9 support

Did we add what Pavel suggested to README.txt and readme.io documentation? Yakov Zhdanov, www.gridgain.com 2018-01-25 14:27 GMT-08:00 Denis Magda : > Pavel, it’s a good point. > > Peter, could you ensure that all Ignite scripts (ignite.sh/bat, > control.sh/bat, etc.) perform this auto detection

Re: Java 9 support

Pavel, it’s a good point. Peter, could you ensure that all Ignite scripts (ignite.sh/bat, control.sh/bat, etc.) perform this auto detection of JVM 9 as well? Alex K. please do the same for Visor and Web Console scripts. — Denis > On Jan 25, 2018, at 1:58 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > > I would

Re: Java 9 support

I would add that to run Ignite on Java 9 without default scripts one has to use the following JVM options: --add-exports=java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED" --add-exports=java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports=java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver=ALL-UNNAME

Re: Java 9 support

Hi, Igniters! Ticket IGNITE-6730 [1] was merged to master (and ignite-2.4) and now we have preliminary support of Java 9, which includes: - compilation with JDK9 with some constraints (scala-2.10 based modules should be turned off) - run with JRE9/JDK9 through default scripts (ignite.{sh|bat})

Re: Java 9 support

Andrey, performance testing is in progress. The first, there are no significant difference in performance on Java 8. But it would be great to test performance on Java 9 also. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Andrey Kuznetsov wrote: > Thanks, Petr. > > I heard of some activity related to performa

Re: Java 9 support

No. We got rid of monitorEnter/monitorExit there. And ReentrantLock is supposed to be a replacement. 2018-01-10 13:49 GMT+03:00 Антон Чураев : > Andrey, do You mean https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908? > > > -- Best regards, Andrey Kuznetsov.

Re: Java 9 support

Andrey, do You mean https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908? 2018-01-10 13:25 GMT+03:00 Andrey Kuznetsov : > Thanks, Petr. > > I heard of some activity related to performance consequences of > ReentrantLocks in IGNITE-6736 fix. So, I'd like to get a reviewer feedback > first. > > Andrey

Re: Java 9 support

Thanks, Petr. I heard of some activity related to performance consequences of ReentrantLocks in IGNITE-6736 fix. So, I'd like to get a reviewer feedback first. Andrey G., Vladimir O., is it possible to merge the fix to master? 2018-01-10 9:56 GMT+03:00 Petr Ivanov : > Andrey — double checked yo

Re: Java 9 support

Andrey — double checked your solution and it works now. Guess there was some merge error first time. Sorry for misleading. So, there is working solution for Java 9 build and I’d like to save this configuration in ignite-6730 (making IGNITE-7144 and IGNITE-6736 to become subtasks in the process)

Re: Java 9 support

Hi Petr! Could you please clarify what is wrong with fix proposed in IGNITE-6736, and what is supposed to be a replacement for monitorEnter/monitorExit now? 2018-01-09 19:08 GMT+03:00 Petr Ivanov : > Hi all. > > > After some thorough research and with help of fellow igniters, I’ve > managed to p

Re: Java 9 support

Vladimir, Thanks for performing the analysis! Yes, we should definitely roll out Java 9 support by the end of this year. — Denis > On Oct 24, 2017, at 8:19 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > > Igniters, > > I created umbrella ticket for Java 9 [1]. All known issues are aggregated > there. I propo