> > > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Key tuples include only key columns. Key columns
>> > come
>> > > >> f
;
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > As for me, these excercises with schema's
> doesn't
> > > &g
these excercises with schema's doesn't
> > >> worth a
> > >> > > lot
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'll add a benchmark and we'll see.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On
;> > > > > > > > each
> >> > > > > > > > > > row
> >> > > > > > > > > > > in collectionof tuples. Also it is not cle
es. Also it is not clear from your
>> > code
>> > > > > > > (probably
>> > > > > > > > > > > mistake?) how differ key tuples and value tuples from
>> > each
>> > > > > other.
>> > > > > > > In
>> > > > > > > > > > > readTuple you always read full schema and check for
>> full
>> > > > > length.
>> > > > > > As
>> > > > >
sn't worth a lot.
> I.e.
> > > > > postgres
> > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > writes field names and then simpy rows with data.
> Saving
> > > few
> > > > > > bytes
> > > > > > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > > make much deal. Btw, msgpack has special types for
> short
> > > > > strings
> > > > &g
str8). It is much easier use it and write field name as
> is.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 14:56 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > ptupit...@apache.org
> > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ivan, tuple serialization section added to the IEP, let
> > me
> > > > know
> &
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:06 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > > > > > ivanda...@gmail.com>
> > > > > &
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can't find any description of tuple serialization in
> IEP,
> > > > only
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:59 Pavel Tupi
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Ivan,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 0. The IEP is not in progress, it is ready for review and
> > > > > > discussion.
> > > > > > > > > > 1. Tuple seri
t; > the
> > > > > > > > PoC
> > > > > > > > > (see ClientMessageHandler#readTuple), let me know if more
> > > details
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > required
> > > > > > > > > 2. Tuple schema serialization is de
> > >> > > > code
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:59 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > ptupit...@apache.org
> > > >> >:
> > > >> > > >
gt; > 3. This IEP is about tables (tuple-based) API only, since it
> is
> > > the
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > API that we have right now, as noted in Risks and
> Assumptions.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:53 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > > > ivanda...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also, is there any clear information about KV api? Is there
> > any
> > > > > plan
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > implement it? Or is there any proposal about it?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:51 Ivan Daschinsky <
> > ivanda...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Pavel, but IEP is in progress, isn't it?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1. There is not any information about tuple
> serialization.
> > > And
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > > > a clear consensus about it.
> > > > > > > > > > 2. There is not any information about schrma
> serialization
> > > > > format.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > ptupit...@apache.org
> > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0
> [1].
> > > > > > > > > >> PoC is in progress [2]
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Andrey V. Mashenkov
> > >> demonstrated
> > >> > in
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > > PoC
> > >> > > > > > > (see ClientMessageHandler#readTuple), let me know if more
> > >> details
> > >> > > are
> > >> > > > > > > required
> > >> > > > > > > 2. Tuple schema serialization is described in SCHEMAS_GET
> > >> > section.
> > >> > > > > Table
> > >> > > > > > > schema (configuration) needs more details, you are right -
> > >> I'll
> > >> > add
> > >> > > > > them.
> > >> > > > > > > 3. This IEP is about tables (tuple-based) API only, since
> it
> > >> is
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > only
> > >> > > > > > > API that we have right now, as noted in Risks and
> > Assumptions.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:53 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > >> > > ivanda...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Also, is there any clear information about KV api? Is
> > there
> > >> any
> > >> > > > plan
> > >> > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > implement it? Or is there any proposal about it?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:51 Ivan Daschinsky <
> > >> ivanda...@gmail.com
> > >> > >:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Pavel, but IEP is in progress, isn't it?
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > 1. There is not any information about tuple
> > serialization.
> > >> > And
> > >> > > > > there
> > >> > > > > > > > isn't
> > >> > > > > > > > > a clear consensus about it.
> > >> > > > > > > > > 2. There is not any information about schrma
> > serialization
> > >> > > > format.
> > >> > > > > > And
> > >> > > > > > > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > >> > ptupit...@apache.org
> > >> > > >:
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >> Igniters,
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0
> > >> [1].
> > >> > > > > > > > >> PoC is in progress [2]
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> [1]
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
t; > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > 0. The IEP is not in progress, it is ready for review and
> > >> > > discussion.
> > >> > > > > > > 1. Tuple serialization is described in the IEP and
> > >> demonstrated
> > > (see ClientMessageHandler#readTuple), let me know if more
> >> details
> >> > > are
> >> > > > > > > required
> >> > > > > > > 2. Tuple schema serialization is described in SCHEMAS_GET
> >> > section.
> >> > > > > Table
> >> > > > > > > schema (configuration) needs more details, you are right -
> >> I'll
> >> > add
> >> > > > > them.
> >> > > > > > > 3. This IEP is about tables (tuple-based) API only, since it
> >> is
> >> > the
> >> > > > > only
> >> > > > > > > API that we have right now, as noted in Risks and
> Assumptions.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:53 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> >> > > ivanda...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Also, is there any clear information about KV api? Is
> there
> >> any
> >> > > > plan
> >> > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > implement it? Or is there any proposal about it?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:51 Ivan Daschinsky <
> >> ivanda...@gmail.com
> >> > >:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Pavel, but IEP is in progress, isn't it?
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > 1. There is not any information about tuple
> serialization.
> >> > And
> >> > > > > there
> >> > > > > > > > isn't
> >> > > > > > > > > a clear consensus about it.
> >> > > > > > > > > 2. There is not any information about schrma
> serialization
> >> > > > format.
> >> > > > > > And
> >> > > > > > > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >> > ptupit...@apache.org
> >> > > >:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >> Igniters,
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0
> >> [1].
> >> > > > > > > > >> PoC is in progress [2]
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > >> [1]
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
gt;> > > > > Table
>> > > > > > > schema (configuration) needs more details, you are right -
>> I'll
>> > add
>> > > > > them.
>> > > > > > > 3. This IEP is about tables (tuple-based) API only, since it
>> is
>> > the
&g
PI that we have right now, as noted in Risks and Assumptions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:53 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > > ivanda...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrot
ny clear information about KV api? Is there any
> > > plan
> > > > to
> > > > > > > implement it? Or is there any proposal about it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:51 Ivan Daschinsky >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pavel, but IEP is in progress, isn't it?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. There is not any information about tuple serialization.
> And
> > > > there
> > > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > a clear consensus about it.
> > > > > > > > 2. There is not any information about schrma serialization
> > > format.
> > > > > And
> > > > > > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupit...@apache.org
> > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Igniters,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0 [1].
> > > > > > > >> PoC is in progress [2]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
e any proposal about it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:51 Ivan Daschinsky :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pavel, but IEP is in progress, isn't it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
gress, isn't it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. There is not any information about tuple serialization. And
> > there
> > > > > isn't
> > > > > > a clear consensus about it.
> > > > > > 2. There is n
bout schrma serialization format.
> > And
> > > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > > > >
> > > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> > > > >
> > > > >> Igniters,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0 [1].
> > > > >> PoC is in progress [2]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
it.
> > > > 2. There is not any information about schrma serialization format.
> And
> > > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > > >
> > > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> > > >
> > > >> I
about it.
> > > 2. There is not any information about schrma serialization format. And
> > > AFAIK, there isn't a clear consensus also.
> > >
> > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> > >
> > >> Igniters,
> > >>
> >
ters,
> >>
> >> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0 [1].
> >> PoC is in progress [2]
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
> >>
> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
> >>
> >
>
ient protocol in 3.0 [1].
>> PoC is in progress [2]
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
>>
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
>>
>
г., 13:26 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Igniters,
>
> Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0 [1].
> PoC is in progress [2]
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
>
> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
>
Igniters,
Please review the IEP for thin client protocol in 3.0 [1].
PoC is in progress [2]
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-76+Thin+Client+Protocol+for+Ignite+3.0
[2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/191
28 matches
Mail list logo
