I like ignitesql.
D.
On Oct 6, 2017, 4:49 PM, at 4:49 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Denis,
>
>Setting default host to 127.0.0.1 is bad idea, because it mean that in
>practice users would have to change the script always. Instead, we
>should
>accept host name as argument. This is perfectly fine
Why would we need googleads for youtube? Any chance to disable it?
D.
On Sep 30, 2017, 10:25 AM, at 10:25 AM, Prachi Garg wrote:
>Yes, I see in dev tools that calls to googleads and doubleclick are
>made
>from Youtube.
>
>On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
>
>> I also did a g
Why not? Obviously compression would have to be enabled per group, not per
cache.
D.
On Sep 29, 2017, 10:50 PM, at 10:50 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>And it will continue hitting us in future. For example, when data
>compression is implemented, for logical caches compression rate will be
>poo
Vova, cache groups almost never need to be touched by users. They should be
configured automatically. To my knowledge, by default all caches fall into the
default group (please confirm).
As far as scans, the performance should not be affected, as we now store
entries in B+trees and the data i
Cos, great point!
I think the Ignite community should start load testing with default settings,
without any config changes. This should open a lot of holes.
D.
On Sep 1, 2017, 9:57 PM, at 9:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>Just to spice it up: in my experience, having a few hundred paramete
Vova, how hard is it to make it multi-threaded?
D.
On Aug 28, 2017, 10:05 AM, at 10:05 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Denis,
>
>We iterate over the whole cache and build the index entry-by-entry.
>Control
>is returned back to the user when index is ready.
>
>On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Yak
But why? We allocate the memory, so we should know when it runs out. What am i
missing?
D.
On Aug 4, 2017, 11:55 AM, at 11:55 AM, Sergey Chugunov
wrote:
>I used GC and java only as an example, they are not applicable to
>Ignite
>case where we manage offheap memory.
>
>My point is that there
Hang on. I thought we were talking about offheap size, GC should not be
relevant. Am I wrong?
D.
On Aug 4, 2017, 11:38 AM, at 11:38 AM, Sergey Chugunov
wrote:
>Do you see an obvious way of implementing it?
>
>In java there is a heap and GC working on it. And for instance, it is
>possible to
Without #3, the #1 and #2 make little sense.
Why is #3 so difficult?
D.
On Aug 4, 2017, 10:46 AM, at 10:46 AM, Sergey Chugunov
wrote:
>Dmitriy,
>
>Last item makes perfect sense to me, one may think of it as an
>"OutOfMemoryException" in java.
>However, it looks like such feature requires con
Yakov,
I think it is not just restarts, this set of nodes is minimally required for
the cluster to function, no?
D.
On Aug 3, 2017, 11:23 AM, at 11:23 AM, Yakov Zhdanov
wrote:
>Ю> How about naming it "minimal node set" or "required node set"?
>
>Required for what? I would add restart if the
How about naming it "minimal node set" or "required node set"?
D.
On Aug 3, 2017, 11:15 AM, at 11:15 AM, Yakov Zhdanov
wrote:
>> * Based on some sort of policies when the actual cluster topology
>differs
>too much from the baseline or when some critical condition happens
>(e.g.,
>when there a
Got it, thanks!
On Aug 3, 2017, 11:04 AM, at 11:04 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Dima,
>
>Our goal is to have a format, which will work for both synchronous,
>asynchronous, single-threaded and multi-threaded clients. All we need
>to
>achieve this is "request ID" propagated from request to response
Vova, 1GB seems a bit too small for me, and frankly i do not want t o guess.
Why not allocate in increments automatically?
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 11:03 PM, at 11:03 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Denis,
>No doubts you haven't heard about it - AI 2.1 with persistence, when
>80% of
>RAM is allocated
I would prefer that we reuse an existing compression protocol, but at the table
level.
If not possible, then we should go with a shared mapping approach. Any idea how
hard?
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 11:15 AM, at 11:15 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Vyacheslav,
>
>This is not about my needs, but abou
Vova, I am not sure what you are proposing... extending H2 parser with new
syntax or a brand new parser?
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 4:26 PM, at 4:26 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
>Andrey,
>
>Note that I am not proposing to remove H2 as a whole. Main point for
>now is
>to support missing pieces of DDL s
I prefer option #1.
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 11:20 AM, at 11:20 AM, Sergey Chugunov
wrote:
>Folks,
>
>I would like to get back to the question about MemoryPolicy maxMemory
>defaults.
>
>Although MemoryPolicy may be configured with initial and maxMemory
>settings, when persistence is used MemoryPoli
Backward compatible?
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 7:04 PM, at 7:04 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn
wrote:
>Dmitry, we don't need any reserved bytes, because protocol is
>versioned.
>
>On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
>
>> We should also leave 8 bytes of empty space for future changes.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Aug
We should also leave 8 bytes of empty space for future changes.
D.
On Aug 1, 2017, 6:41 PM, at 6:41 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn
wrote:
>Alexey, good idea. ODBC and JDBC could also benefit from this.
>
>On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
>
>wrote:
>
>> Pavel,
>>
>> How about data compress
Agree with Val, we should bring it back.
D.
On Jul 24, 2017, 8:14 PM, at 8:14 PM, Valentin Kulichenko
wrote:
>Guys,
>
>Some time ago we removed FairAffinityFunction from the project.
>However, my
>communication with users clearly shows that is was a rush decision.
>Distribution showed by Fair
Sounds good.
On Jul 20, 2017, 1:56 PM, at 1:56 PM, Yury Babak wrote:
>Dmitriy, I can do it. But as far as I know Oleg Ignatenko already wrote
>blog
>about Ignite ML. But it only about AI 2.0 and only on
>Russian(Habrahabr). So
>we could translate this post in English.
>
>And also I can write a bl
Sounds good!
D.
On Jul 19, 2017, 1:54 PM, at 1:54 PM, Ivan Rakov wrote:
>Dmitriy,
>
>I agree, hashFunctionScore is more comprehensible.
>I'd correct it to "pageHashFunctionScore" to make it clear that it's
>about function that distributes pages, not about hashCode() of
>user-provided keys.
>
>
I would try to ping legal again and see if they respond. If not, I think we
will need to come up with a simpler approach, that does not require legal
approval.
D.
On Jul 18, 2017, 2:23 PM, at 2:23 PM, Nikita Ivanov wrote:
>Igniters,
>Just a quick update. I haven't gotten response from ASF Le
Probably a good task for a newbie.
D.
On Jun 21, 2017, 9:41 AM, at 9:41 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
>Done,
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5565
>
>I think it could take a couple of days in background mode.
>
>On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
>
>wrote:
>
>> Th
Vladimir Ozerov wrote
> This is how we fixed it for now. But it requires paths locking starting
> from the root. Otherwise they can become parent-child in a moment after
> sucessfull check.
I am not sure if we should be concerned about looking at the root or path
here. This lock is only held for t
24 matches
Mail list logo
