Got it, thanks!
On Aug 3, 2017, 11:04 AM, at 11:04 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: >Dima, > >Our goal is to have a format, which will work for both synchronous, >asynchronous, single-threaded and multi-threaded clients. All we need >to >achieve this is "request ID" propagated from request to response. This >way >3-rd party developers will be free to decide how to implement the >client. > >On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan ><dsetrak...@apache.org> >wrote: > >> Let us not forget that the main purpose of such protocol is to enable >other >> users contribute their own client implementations for various >languages. >> Also, most JDBC and ODBC use cases work in thread-per-connection >mode. >> >> I think that if we introduce a multi-threaded client here, then it >will be >> a lot harder to understand, configure, use, or contribute, so I agree >with >> Vladimir. >> >> Let's keep it simple for now. >> >> D. >> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Agree with Alex. I think our implementations should share single >> connection >> > over threads in the process. >> > >> > --Yakov >> > >>
