Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

2019-10-23 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Igniters, I would be happy to serve this role, but since my day job current projects not related to Ignite, it may cause some delays in replies. I would give my +1 to both candidates, but I'm concerned how keeping PMC Chair inside the company initially donated code to ASF could move the commun

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

2019-10-23 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi, I looked into the way Apache Bahir manages their extensions for Spark and Flink and it looks like they are much independent in terms of managing their releases. They also have separate git repos for apache bahir and apache bahir-flink. Releases : https://bahir.apache.org/downloads/spark/ http

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

2019-10-23 Thread Nikita Ivanov
+1 Alexey Goncharuk -- Nikita Ivanov > On Oct 21, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > > Igniters, > > It’s been almost 3 years since my election as the PMC Chair and I’d like > the community to give other PMC members an opportunity to serve in this > role. It’s healthy to rotate the role

Re: [DISCUSS] Pub/Sub Streamer Implementation

2019-10-23 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Denis, Thank you for your response. Yes, I have created the following discussion thread for Ignite extensions migration. http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Proposal-for-Ignite-Extensions-as-a-separate-Bahir-module-or-Incubator-project-td44064.html Regards, Saikat O

Re: [DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation time

2019-10-23 Thread Denis Magda
Folks, Any other candidates or opinions before I start the vote? - Denis On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:33 AM Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > Hello! > > +1 to all three :) > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > вт, 22 окт. 2019 г. в 09:24, Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > IMHO, today Dmitriy Pavlov is the best

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

2019-10-23 Thread Denis Magda
Folks, How about considering the option Dmitriy named as "0. placing integration in a separate module within space of Apache Ignite"? Nothing prevents us from following concepts of Bahir project in the sense that we'll be creating and managing separate repositories for Ignite extensions/modules b

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

2019-10-23 Thread Emmanouil Gkatziouras
Hi all, I come from the Pub/Sub integration [1] thread. I had a check on Bahir and making an implementation there would be nice. My concern is if Bahir's description limits the choices on a connector implementation. 'Apache Bahir provides extensions to multiple distributed analytic platforms, exte

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Ignite Extensions as a separate Bahir module or Incubator project

2019-10-23 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi, Saikat, Alexey, Actually we have 3 ways to solve it. 0. placing integration in a separate module within space of Apache Ignite 1. Apache Bahir 2. Apache Incubator I'm not sure if option 2 is the best one since it is more about building a new community around Ignite Extensions, it may be trick

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
The only issue with the Spark integration tests - they should be runned under JDK8. That's all. I wrote about it recently [1] [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Spark-examples-on-TC-td43591.html В Ср, 23/10/2019 в 17:46 +0200, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: > Good point, now the

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
Good point, now they are not in the Best state, we have a few ideas how to fix, will discuss it later here in this thread. If you have any objection write it, but my position - creation special Spark Visa on TC, like for ML, maybe two for different Spark versions, and all commits to Spark will req

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12326) JDBC thin returns java.util.Date instead of java.sql.Date if input values, putted to cache via cache API are LocalDate or java.sql.Date.

2019-10-23 Thread Alexander Lapin (Jira)
Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-12326: Summary: JDBC thin returns java.util.Date instead of java.sql.Date if input values, putted to cache via cache API are LocalDate or java.sql.Date. Key: IGNITE-12326 URL: h

Re: Thin clients: WithExpiryPolicy

2019-10-23 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Ok, no objections On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:36 PM Alexandr Shapkin wrote: > Pavel, > > I think that in some cases milliseconds could make sense, > so I would like to keep the current precision. > > With this approach we will avoid unnecessary code changes as well as > keeping API in consistence

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Actually, I meant running tests on TeamCity. ср, 23 окт. 2019 г. в 15:36, Alexey Zinoviev : > > What kind of testing do you mean? JUnit, integration via example or > something else? > > ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 14:16 Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > Correction. > > > > How are you going to TEST integrations wi

RE: Thin clients: WithExpiryPolicy

2019-10-23 Thread Alexandr Shapkin
Pavel, I think that in some cases milliseconds could make sense, so I would like to keep the current precision. With this approach we will avoid unnecessary code changes as well as keeping API in consistence with the thick client method and cacheConfiguration settings. From: Pavel Tupitsyn S

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12325) GridCacheMapEntry reservation mechanism is broken with enabled cache store

2019-10-23 Thread Pavel Kovalenko (Jira)
Pavel Kovalenko created IGNITE-12325: Summary: GridCacheMapEntry reservation mechanism is broken with enabled cache store Key: IGNITE-12325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12325

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
What kind of testing do you mean? JUnit, integration via example or something else? ср, 23 окт. 2019 г., 14:16 Ivan Pavlukhin : > Correction. > > How are you going to TEST integrations with different Spark versions? > > ср, 23 окт. 2019 г. в 15:16, Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > > Alexey, > > > > Thank

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Correction. How are you going to TEST integrations with different Spark versions? ср, 23 окт. 2019 г. в 15:16, Ivan Pavlukhin : > > Alexey, > > Thank you for sharing the summary! > > Small question. How are you going to integrations with different Spark > versions? > > чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 22:3

Re: Ignite-Spark integration meeting

2019-10-23 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Alexey, Thank you for sharing the summary! Small question. How are you going to integrations with different Spark versions? чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 22:30, Denis Magda : > > > > > 1. We are going to release Apache Ignite 2.8 with limited support of > >Spark 2.4.4 (known issues are listed here