Folks, Any other candidates or opinions before I start the vote?
- Denis On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:33 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > +1 to all three :) > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > вт, 22 окт. 2019 г. в 09:24, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > IMHO, today Dmitriy Pavlov is the best candidate for this role. He > > invested a lot into community health and productivity (TC bot and much > > more). > > > > вт, 22 окт. 2019 г. в 09:15, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Igniters, I'd suggest 2 candidates who perfectly fit this role, in my > > opinion: > > > > > > Nickolay Izhikov - one of the most active community member with the > > > significant contributions, Ignite's evangelist and tech-speaker. > > > > > > Alexey Goncharuk - Ignite's veteran, one of the Ignite's code-base > > > expert with the project's architecture vision. > > > > > > I hope they would like to be PMC Chair!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:21 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > It’s been almost 3 years since my election as the PMC Chair and I’d > > like > > > > the community to give other PMC members an opportunity to serve in > this > > > > role. It’s healthy to rotate the role more frequently and we’re > already > > > > due. Though the chair doesn’t have formal power, he/she can bring a > > fresh > > > > perspective and help to navigate the community via trails not > > considered > > > > before. > > > > > > > > Please propose candidates selecting among active PMC members: > > > > https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html#people > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, December 5, 2016, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I haven't forgotten. Just got back from a business trip. Will start > > a vote > > > > > this week. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Cos, I will start the vote soon. A bit over occupied with travel > > and > > > > > > holidays at this moment. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < > > c...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Ok, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> This was a great discussion, thanks for the deep insight, Roman! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> looks like this thread has stewed for a while and it is time to > > [VOTE]. > > > > > >> The > > > > > >> following candidates were put forward during the [DISCUSS] (in > > the order > > > > > >> of > > > > > >> their appearance on the thread): > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Dmitriy Setrakyan > > > > > >> Vladimir Ozerov > > > > > >> Konstantin Boudnik > > > > > >> Valentin Kulichenko > > > > > >> Denis Magda > > > > > >> Branko Čibej > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Considering the number of the candidates I propose to use > > > > > >> First-past-the-post > > > > > >> voting, with a single-round/single winner rules, where the > > candidate > > > > > >> collecting the most votes (not the majority) wins. [1] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Dmitriy, would you do the honors and start the formal [VOTE]? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-past-the-post_voting > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> Cos > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:19PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > > > > > >> > <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > > While all the candidates suggested so far look good, I would > > propose > > > > > >> Denis > > > > > >> > > Magda as the next PMC chair. His participation in the > project > > does > > > > > >> not only > > > > > >> > > have to do with the code, but also with Ignite project > > overall, > > > > > >> including > > > > > >> > > website, documentation, new tickets, design, etc. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Sorry to come to this thread rather late, but I wanted to > offer > > a > > > > > >> somewhat > > > > > >> > different perspective that hopefully can help reframe this > > discussion > > > > > >> > a little bit. > > > > > >> > Note, that what I'm about to say is coming from a non-coding > (on > > > > > >> Ignite) member > > > > > >> > of the PMC. In fact, I stayed on the PMC after graduation more > > with my > > > > > >> ASF > > > > > >> > member hat on, rather than as somebody who wanted to directly > > > > > contribute > > > > > >> > to where the technology was going. My concern during your > > incubation > > > > > >> days > > > > > >> > was (and still is!) how well are you guys doing on the > community > > > > > >> development > > > > > >> > front. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > If you recall, the diversity requirement (the fact that more > > than 80% > > > > > >> of project > > > > > >> > members work for the same company) came up during our > > graduation. > > > > > While > > > > > >> > it wasn't a blocking requirement it still was a very valid > > concern. > > > > > >> Monocultures > > > > > >> > are really nasty for open source communities. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I think it would be fair to say that Ignite community hasn't > > really > > > > > >> > improved much > > > > > >> > diversity-wise since its graduation. And I honestly feel that > > this is, > > > > > >> > to a larger > > > > > >> > extent, because the focus is now missing. It was well > > understood that > > > > > >> in order > > > > > >> > to graduate the community had to do all it can to demonstrate > a > > > > > >> > positive trajectory > > > > > >> > in that direction. And we did. But we kind of dropped the ball > > on it > > > > > >> since. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > With that in mind, I offer my view on what a change in the > > Chair could > > > > > >> > offer: a renewed > > > > > >> > focus on community growth and development. If you agree with > > this > > > > > >> premise than > > > > > >> > somebody like Branko or Cos who could act as a forcing > function > > to > > > > > >> constantly > > > > > >> > remind us about what else can we do to grow and develop this > > community > > > > > >> would > > > > > >> > be an ideal choice for the Chair (after all Branko's "tough > > love" was > > > > > >> > probably the > > > > > >> > most useful part of Ignite's experience in the Incubator). > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Now, of course, strictly speaking you don't have to be a Chair > > to do > > > > > >> > that. But lets > > > > > >> > face it -- that helps. And besides, a project's Chair doesn't > > really > > > > > >> > have any special > > > > > >> > powers when it comes to technological consensus, but anything > > that has > > > > > >> to do > > > > > >> > with external community the VP title that the chair gets can > > help > > > > > quite > > > > > >> a bit. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Long story short: if Branko or Cos (as former mentors) would > > like to > > > > > >> > commit to 6 more > > > > > >> > months of the same hands-on mentorship focused on community > > > > > development > > > > > >> -- they > > > > > >> > would have my wholehearted support. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > >> > Roman (with my PMC member hat on). > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > - > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D. > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > >
