Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-10-03 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
With 7 +1 votes and 1 -0, this passes. I'll work with Micah to clarify some of the sections that he pointed out, but I don't think that we need to block moving forward on the overall set of things that are proposed. Thanks, everyone! On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 1:49 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-10-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:36 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to vote on PR #10955 that has been open for a while with the changes > to add new type promotion cases. After discussion, the PR has been scoped > down to keep complexity low. It

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-10-01 Thread Eduard Tudenhöfner
+1 (binding) On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 1:45 AM Micah Kornfield wrote: > I'm -0.0 as worded currently. I think there are some more aspects that > should be defined for date->timestamp/timestamp_ns promotion (left comments > on the PR). The addition of an Unknown type seems like a good addition. >

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-30 Thread Micah Kornfield
I'm -0.0 as worded currently. I think there are some more aspects that should be defined for date->timestamp/timestamp_ns promotion (left comments on the PR). The addition of an Unknown type seems like a good addition. Thanks, Micah On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 2:32 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1(binding

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-30 Thread Yufei Gu
+1(binding) Yufei On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:42 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Amogh Jahagirdar > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 1:39 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: >> >>> +1 (bindi

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-30 Thread Amogh Jahagirdar
+1 (binding) Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 1:39 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 2:41 PM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (bindin

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-30 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 2:41 PM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:37 PM rdb...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to vote on PR #10955 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-30 Thread Daniel Weeks
+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 2:41 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:37 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to vote on PR #10955 >> that has been open for a >> while with the chang

Re: [VOTE] Table v3 spec: Add unknown and new type promotion

2024-09-27 Thread Russell Spitzer
+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:37 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to vote on PR #10955 > that has been open for a > while with the changes to add new type promotion cases. After discussion, > the PR has been scoped dow