+1 (non binding) Regards JB
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:36 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to vote on PR #10955 that has been open for a while with the changes > to add new type promotion cases. After discussion, the PR has been scoped > down to keep complexity low. It now adds: > > * An `unknown` type for cases when only `null` values have been observed > * Type promotion from `unknown` to any other type > * Type promotion from `date` to `timestamp` or `timestamp_ns` > * Clarification that promotion is not allowed if it breaks transform results > > The set of changes is quite a bit smaller than originally proposed because of > the issue already discussed about lower and upper bounds values, and it no > longer includes variant. I think that we can add more type promotion cases > after we improve bounds metadata. This adds what we can now to keep v3 moving > forward. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . > > Thanks, > > Ryan
