Thanks for taking a look!
The vote has passed with the following results:
- +1 binding vote: 6
- +1 non-binding vote: 2 (including mine)
I see the PR itself also has a number of approvals, so would someone with
committer privileges mind merging it?
Also, for the record, credit also goes t
+1
I think this is an elegant solution, thanks for working on this Gabor!
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op vr 24 jan 2025 om 21:31 schreef Honah J. :
> +1, thanks Gabor!
>
> Best regards,
> Honah
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 'd on the
+1, thanks Gabor!
Best regards,
Honah
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> +1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :)
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks, Gabor!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christia
+1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :)
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks, Gabor!
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel <
> christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor!
>>
>> Daniel Weeks schri
+1
Thanks, Gabor!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel
wrote:
> +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor!
>
> Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec
+1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor!
Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change
>> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general
>> cons
+1
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change
> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general
> consensus on the approach.
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab
> wrote:
>
+1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change during
this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general consensus on
the approach.
Yufei
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab
wrote:
> Hi Iceberg Community,
>
> I have a PR for changing the REST spec
>
