I agree that it makes sense to add this, so I'm +1 on this.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Gabor
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> It makes sense to me. Thanks !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:32 AM Gabor Kaszab
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Iceberg Comm
Hi Gabor
Sorry for the late reply.
It makes sense to me. Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:32 AM Gabor Kaszab wrote:
>
> Hi Iceberg Community,
>
> There has been a PR merged recently that enhances "expire snapshots" to drop
> the unused partition specs. I myself started working n
Thanks for the support, Amogh!
Would be great to hear other opinions too! :)
Meanwhile, I have the PR for removing the unused schemas:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12089
And this is the PR for the REST spec change for the new update type:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12022 (Th
Thanks Gabor for starting this thread,
I'm +1 on adding the RemoveSchemasUpdate to the REST Spec! I think it's an
important step in maintaining metadata to ensure that it's as small
as possible.
Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:34 AM Gabor Kaszab wrote:
> Hi Iceberg Community
