Thanks for the support, Amogh! Would be great to hear other opinions too! :)
Meanwhile, I have the PR for removing the unused schemas: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12089 And this is the PR for the REST spec change for the new update type: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12022 (This one requires a vote, but I wanted to solicit general opinions first) Hope this makes sense! Gabor On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:35 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Gabor for starting this thread, > > I'm +1 on adding the RemoveSchemasUpdate to the REST Spec! I think it's an > important step in maintaining metadata to ensure that it's as small > as possible. > Thanks, > > Amogh Jahagirdar > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:34 AM Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Iceberg Community, >> >> There has been a PR merged recently that enhances "expire snapshots" to >> drop the unused partition specs. I myself started working now on a very >> similar PR just for dropping the unused schemas. >> As per this change I have a PR >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12022> to extend the update >> types in the REST spec with RemoveSchemasUpdate (similarly to this one >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10846>). >> >> Would you mind giving some feedback on this PR? >> >> Thanks, >> Gabor >> >>
