Thanks for the support, Amogh!

Would be great to hear other opinions too! :)

Meanwhile, I have the PR for removing the unused schemas:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12089
And this is the PR for the REST spec change for the new update type:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12022 (This one requires a vote, but
I wanted to solicit general opinions first)

Hope this makes sense!
Gabor

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:35 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gabor for starting this thread,
>
> I'm +1 on adding the RemoveSchemasUpdate to the REST Spec! I think it's an
> important step in maintaining metadata to ensure that it's as small
> as possible.
> Thanks,
>
> Amogh Jahagirdar
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:34 AM Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Iceberg Community,
>>
>> There has been a PR merged recently that enhances "expire snapshots" to
>> drop the unused partition specs. I myself started working now on a very
>> similar PR just for dropping the unused schemas.
>> As per this change I have a PR
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12022> to extend the update
>> types in the REST spec with RemoveSchemasUpdate (similarly to this one
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10846>).
>>
>> Would you mind giving some feedback on this PR?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gabor
>>
>>

Reply via email to