Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-28 Thread Russell Spitzer
I forgot Peter! I'm so sorry! That should have been +1: 4 (binding), 5 (non-binding). {Russell, Steven Wu, Fokko, Peter} | {JB, Karuppayya, Kevin, Huaxin, Aihua} +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 4:29 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > Thanks

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Russell Spitzer
Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1. The vote result is: +1: 3 (binding), 5 (non-binding). {Russell, Steven Wu, Fokko} | {JB, Karuppayya, Kevin, Huaxin, Aihua} +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore, the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Russell Spitzer
I'm +1 (Binding) as well so I'll close out this vote On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:28 PM Aihua Xu wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > Verified against Snowflake engine. > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:28 AM huaxin gao wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Verified signature, checksum, license and ran some tests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Aihua Xu
+1 (non-binding). Verified against Snowflake engine. On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:28 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Verified signature, checksum, license and ran some tests. > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:06 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> For all those who haven't seen this before, GP

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread huaxin gao
+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum, license and ran some tests. On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:06 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > For all those who haven't seen this before, GPG key signing is a very > "early hacker" sort of thing. The idea is the only way to trust a signature > is to > have i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Russell Spitzer
For all those who haven't seen this before, GPG key signing is a very "early hacker" sort of thing. The idea is the only way to trust a signature is to have it signed by someone that you also trust. This builds a network of trust so you could essentially do something like say I trust that key X is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Kevin Liu
+1 (non-binding) - Verified signature, checksum, license. * Build + test passed using Java 17 on M1 * Ran a few examples on Spark * Ran pyiceberg integration tests Best, Kevin Liu On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:59 AM karuppayya wrote: > When verifying >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread karuppayya
When verifying signatures. I got a warning. Am I missing something with the gpg configuration? gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-1.9.1.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Wed May 21 15:19:17 2025 PDT gpg:using RSA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) I checked: * source distribution ** checksum and signature are good ** LICENSE and NOTICE look good ** No binary file found in the source distribution ** Header looks good in files ** Build works from the source distribution ** Tested with Spark and Polaris * in the bundled jar fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Fokko Driesprong
+1 (binding) Ran signatures/checksums/tests/license Kind regards, Fokko Op di 27 mei 2025 om 14:48 schreef Péter Váry : > +1 (binding) > tested signatures, built, run some tests > > Ajantha Bhat ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 27., > K, 14:40): > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> * validated checksum an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Péter Váry
+1 (binding) tested signatures, built, run some tests Ajantha Bhat ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 27., K, 14:40): > +1 (non-binding) > > * validated checksum and signature > * checked license docs & ran RAT checks > * ran build and tests > > - Ajantha > > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:19 AM Yuya Eb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-27 Thread Ajantha Bhat
+1 (non-binding) * validated checksum and signature * checked license docs & ran RAT checks * ran build and tests - Ajantha On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:19 AM Yuya Ebihara wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Confirmed that Trino and Starburst CI are green. > It runs tests against several catalogs, inc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-26 Thread Yuya Ebihara
+1 (non-binding) Confirmed that Trino and Starburst CI are green. It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and Snowflake. Yuya On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 7:37 AM Steven Wu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-23 Thread Steven Wu
+1 (binding) Checked signature, checksum, and licenses. "./gradlew build" passed with the source bundle. Ran Flink 1.20 with SQL On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:42 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > Discussion was back here - > https://lists.apache.org/thread/497qxkq3nfplwo27fh959zhsc2o7hkmy > > On Thu, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-23 Thread Russell Spitzer
Discussion was back here - https://lists.apache.org/thread/497qxkq3nfplwo27fh959zhsc2o7hkmy On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:09 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > Thanks Ebihara for pointing me to the change. > > We should probably capture end user related changes in the release notes > (separate section). > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-21 Thread Ajantha Bhat
Thanks Ebihara for pointing me to the change. We should probably capture end user related changes in the release notes (separate section). I will close that issue. I am good with this RC. I will test and vote. On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:26 AM Yuya Ebihara < yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-21 Thread Yuya Ebihara
Hi Ajantha, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12318 made JSON un-pretty for reduing the file size. BR, Yuya On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 1:52 PM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Just observed this change (table metadata JSON file is not formatted > anymore) > https://github.com/apache/ice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-21 Thread Ajantha Bhat
Hi Russell, Just observed this change (table metadata JSON file is not formatted anymore) https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/13122 If it is induced by 1.9.0, we should probably fix it and include it in RC? No functional impact. - Ajantha On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:49 AM Russell Spitzer wr

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 RC1

2025-05-21 Thread Russell Spitzer
Hi Y'all, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 release. The commit ID is f40208ae6fb2f33e578c2637d3dea1db18739f31 * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 * https://githu