+1 (binding) tested signatures, built, run some tests Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 27., K, 14:40):
> +1 (non-binding) > > * validated checksum and signature > * checked license docs & ran RAT checks > * ran build and tests > > - Ajantha > > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:19 AM Yuya Ebihara < > yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Confirmed that Trino and Starburst CI are green. >> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC >> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and >> Snowflake. >> >> Yuya >> >> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 7:37 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Checked signature, checksum, and licenses. >>> "./gradlew build" passed with the source bundle. >>> Ran Flink 1.20 with SQL >>> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:42 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Discussion was back here - >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/497qxkq3nfplwo27fh959zhsc2o7hkmy >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:09 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Ebihara for pointing me to the change. >>>>> >>>>> We should probably capture end user related changes in the release >>>>> notes (separate section). >>>>> I will close that issue. >>>>> >>>>> I am good with this RC. I will test and vote. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:26 AM Yuya Ebihara < >>>>> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ajantha, >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12318 made JSON un-pretty for >>>>>> reduing the file size. >>>>>> >>>>>> BR, >>>>>> Yuya >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 1:52 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Russell, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just observed this change (table metadata JSON file is not formatted >>>>>>> anymore) >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/13122 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it is induced by 1.9.0, we should probably fix it and include it >>>>>>> in RC? >>>>>>> No functional impact. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Ajantha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:49 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Y'all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.1 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The commit ID is f40208ae6fb2f33e578c2637d3dea1db18739f31 >>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/f40208ae6fb2f33e578c2637d3dea1db18739f31 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1202/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For those watching the big change between this and RC0 was the >>>>>>>> reversion of code which >>>>>>>> caused the rest client to emit multiple Snapshot Removals Requests >>>>>>>> in the same MetadataUpdate. >>>>>>>> This restores the behavior to that of 1.8.X, 1 removal per update. >>>>>>>> We plan to move to the new behavior in a later release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
