Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

Thanks for taking a look! The vote has passed with the following results: - +1 binding vote: 6 - +1 non-binding vote: 2 (including mine) I see the PR itself also has a number of approvals, so would someone with committer privileges mind merging it? Also, for the record, credit also goes t

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 I think this is an elegant solution, thanks for working on this Gabor! Kind regards, Fokko Op vr 24 jan 2025 om 21:31 schreef Honah J. : > +1, thanks Gabor! > > Best regards, > Honah > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 'd on the

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1, thanks Gabor! Best regards, Honah On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:30 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :) > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks, Gabor! >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christia

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 'd on the PR earlier, but for the record +1 here as well :) On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, Gabor! > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel < > christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! >> >> Daniel Weeks schri

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 Thanks, Gabor! On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 9:25 AM Christian Thiel wrote: > +1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! > > Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: >> >>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor! Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change >> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general >> cons

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1 On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change > during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general > consensus on the approach. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

+1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general consensus on the approach. Yufei On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM Gabor Kaszab wrote: > Hi Iceberg Community, > > I have a PR for changing the REST spec >

[VOTE] REST API changes for freshness-aware table loading

Hi Iceberg Community, I have a PR for changing the REST spec as part of the freshness-aware table loading proposal. I feel that the spec part is something that the participants have agreed on so I think this is the time to start a vote. Links: PR fo