+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1
> Yufei
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fokko
>>
>> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng
>> :
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2025, at
+1
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 PM Matt Topol wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef H
+1
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography
> spec, we noticed some parts that can be sim
Late to the party :)
Thanks Szehon
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:53 PM Szehon Ho wrote:
> Thanks all for voting!
>
> The vote result is:
>
> +1: 9 (binding: Renjie, Eduard, Fokko, Yufei, Ryan, Daniel, Amogh,
> Russell, Szehon), 9 (non-binding: Jia, Gang, Bryan, Huang-Hsiang, Matt,
Thanks all for voting!
The vote result is:
+1: 9 (binding: Renjie, Eduard, Fokko, Yufei, Ryan, Daniel, Amogh, Russell,
Szehon), 9 (non-binding: Jia, Gang, Bryan, Huang-Hsiang, Matt,
Jean-Baptiste, Steve, Prasant, Huaxin)
+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
Therefore
+1
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 10:42 PM huaxin gao wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:32 PM Prashant Singh
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Prashant
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer <
>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (bind
>>>
>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:32 PM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Best,
> Prashant
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (bind
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-bin
+1 (non binding)
Best,
Prashant
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> +1 (bind
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve Zhang
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
+1 (bind
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Zhang
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Steve Zhang
> On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
+1
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:50 PM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > While working on the reference imp
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec, we
> noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version:
>
> Default values should always be null (requires
+1
Yufei
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> +1
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng
> :
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I double-checked why a JSON object was all
+1
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng
:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It
> looks like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON,
+1 (non-binding)
> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It looks
> like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched to
> using projjson: where points to a table property.
>
> On W
+1
I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It looks
like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched to
using projjson: where points to a table property.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:45 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2
+1
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:30 AM Gang Wu wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > While working on the reference implementation
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 9:30 AM Gang Wu wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > While working on the reference imple
Makes sense.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you!
>
> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography
> spec,
> > we noticed some parts that can be s
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you!
On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec,
> we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version:
>
>1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT s
Hi everyone,
While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec,
we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version:
1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT serialization
logic, for not many real world use cases)
2. JSON type serializ
21 matches
Mail list logo