Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-04-05 Thread Matt Topol
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1 > Yufei > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng >> : >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2025, at

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-04-04 Thread Ryan Blue
+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 PM Matt Topol wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 2:02 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef H

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-04-04 Thread Daniel Weeks
+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography > spec, we noticed some parts that can be sim

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-25 Thread Manish Malhotra
Late to the party :) Thanks Szehon +1 (non-binding) On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 5:53 PM Szehon Ho wrote: > Thanks all for voting! > > The vote result is: > > +1: 9 (binding: Renjie, Eduard, Fokko, Yufei, Ryan, Daniel, Amogh, > Russell, Szehon), 9 (non-binding: Jia, Gang, Bryan, Huang-Hsiang, Matt,

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-23 Thread Szehon Ho
Thanks all for voting! The vote result is: +1: 9 (binding: Renjie, Eduard, Fokko, Yufei, Ryan, Daniel, Amogh, Russell, Szehon), 9 (non-binding: Jia, Gang, Bryan, Huang-Hsiang, Matt, Jean-Baptiste, Steve, Prasant, Huaxin) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-23 Thread Szehon Ho
+1 On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 10:42 PM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:32 PM Prashant Singh > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Best, >> Prashant >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (bind >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-22 Thread huaxin gao
+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:32 PM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Best, > Prashant > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (bind >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-bin

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-22 Thread Prashant Singh
+1 (non binding) Best, Prashant On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:03 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (bind > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >> >> On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-21 Thread Russell Spitzer
+1 (bind On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM Steve Zhang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-21 Thread Steve Zhang
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Mar 18, 2025, at 6:29 PM, Gang Wu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-21 Thread Amogh Jahagirdar
+1 On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:50 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > While working on the reference imp

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec, we > noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version: > > Default values should always be null (requires

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 Yufei On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng > : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> I double-checked why a JSON object was all

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Fokko Driesprong
+1 Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng : > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote: > > +1 > > I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It > looks like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON,

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Huang-Hsiang Cheng
+1 (non-binding) > On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote: > > +1 > > I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It looks > like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched to > using projjson: where points to a table property. > > On W

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Brian Hulette
+1 I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It looks like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched to using projjson: where points to a table property. On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:45 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Eduard Tudenhöfner
+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:30 AM Gang Wu wrote: > Makes sense. > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thank you! >> >> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > While working on the reference implementation

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-19 Thread Renjie Liu
+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 9:30 AM Gang Wu wrote: > Makes sense. > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thank you! >> >> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > While working on the reference imple

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-18 Thread Gang Wu
Makes sense. +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thank you! > > On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography > spec, > > we noticed some parts that can be s

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-18 Thread Jia Yu
+1 (non-binding) Thank you! On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: > Hi everyone, > > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec, > we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version: > >1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT s

[VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

2025-03-18 Thread Szehon Ho
Hi everyone, While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography spec, we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version: 1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT serialization logic, for not many real world use cases) 2. JSON type serializ