Thanks Ryan for reaching out. It's great to have a path ahead for everyone.
Thanks,
Manu
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 11:55 PM Ryan Blue
wrote:
> To follow up on this, I also reached out to Manu who was the only -1 vote.
> I can understand his concern about forcing people to stay on the 1.6
> release
To follow up on this, I also reached out to Manu who was the only -1 vote.
I can understand his concern about forcing people to stay on the 1.6
release if they can't upgrade Java. I suggested that we maintain the 1.6
line a bit longer than we otherwise would with critical bug fixes and patch
releas
Hi
Thank you all for your participation. This is the summary of votes
binding +1: 6
binding -1: 0
non-binding +1: 10
non-binding -1: 1
If i am not mistaken, this means we concluded the vote as 'yes' for
dropping Java 8 support in 1.7.0 release.
I wish we had unanimous decision, but I am aware
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:35 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Huang-Hsiang
>
> On Jul 27, 2024, at 12:42 AM, Steve Zhang
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Zhang
>
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wr
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Huang-Hsiang
> On Jul 27, 2024, at 12:42 AM, Steve Zhang
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Zhang
>
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>
+1 (non binding)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:25 PM Piotr Findeisen
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed previously
> on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail threads.
>
> As JB kindly pointed out, for a vote w
-1 (non-binding)
I've expressed my concern for existing JDK 8 users in the discussion
thread. Can we push this to later 1.x versions if we only want to include
breaking API changes in 2.0?
Thanks,
Manu
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 2:21 AM Robert Stupp wrote:
> +1 (nb)
> On 26.07.24 18:42, Steve Zha
+1 (nb)
On 26.07.24 18:42, Steve Zhang wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Steve Zhang
On Jul 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
--
Robert Stupp
@snazy
+1 (binding)
Yufei
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:05 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> I mean +1 to _drop_ java 8 in 1.7.0 :)
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (nb) to Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dmitri.
>>
I mean +1 to _drop_ java 8 in 1.7.0 :)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com> wrote:
> +1 (nb) to Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:29 AM Piotr Findeisen
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Dropping support for
+1 (nb) to Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0.
Cheers,
Dmitri.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:29 AM Piotr Findeisen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed
> previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail
> threads.
>
> As JB kindly poi
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Steve Zhang
> On Jul 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 9:57 AM Szehon Ho wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> Szehon
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Steven Wu wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I would also suggest keeping the vote open for 7 days for a larger
>> decision like this.
+1 (binding)
Thanks
Szehon
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Steven Wu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I would also suggest keeping the vote open for 7 days for a larger
> decision like this.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:50 AM Ryan Blue
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Russell
+1 (binding)
I would also suggest keeping the vote open for 7 days for a larger decision
like this.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:50 AM Ryan Blue
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Russell Spitzer
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (bind)
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM Péter Váry
>> wrote:
>>
+1
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> +1 (bind)
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM Péter Váry
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Ajantha Bhat ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. 26.,
>> P, 14:51):
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>> etu
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 4:26 AM Piotr Findeisen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed
> previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail
> threads.
>
> As JB kindly pointed out, for a vote we need a "VOTE" thread
+1 (bind)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM Péter Váry
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Ajantha Bhat ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. 26.,
> P, 14:51):
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 suppor
+1 (non-binding)
Ajantha Bhat ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. 26., P,
14:51):
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 support with Iceberg 1.7.0
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:29 PM Piotr Findeisen <
+1
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 support with Iceberg 1.7.0
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:29 PM Piotr Findeisen
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed
>> previously on "Dropping J
+1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 support with Iceberg 1.7.0
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:29 PM Piotr Findeisen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed
> previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail
> threads.
>
> As JB kindly po
Hi,
Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed
previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail
threads.
As JB kindly pointed out, for a vote we need a "VOTE" thread, so here we go.
Question: Should we drop Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0?
Best,
Piotr
22 matches
Mail list logo