+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I would also suggest keeping the vote open for 7 days for a larger > decision like this. > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:50 AM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:42 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (bind) >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 8:34 AM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. >>>> 26., P, 14:51): >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for dropping JDK8 support with Iceberg 1.7.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 1:29 PM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dropping support for building and running on Java 8 was discussed >>>>>>> previously on "Dropping JDK 8 support" and "Building with JDK 21" mail >>>>>>> threads. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As JB kindly pointed out, for a vote we need a "VOTE" thread, so >>>>>>> here we go. >>>>>>> Question: Should we drop Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) from me >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> -- >> Ryan Blue >> Databricks >> >
