Issue is fixed and will be sending out a vote for RC2. Sorry everyone!
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:50 PM Kevin Liu wrote:
> Hey Matt,
>
> -1 (non binding) We need a new RC due to the issues below.
>
> I found a few issues while verifying the RC.
>
> The first one is minor. The "[2]:" text mentions
Hey Matt,
-1 (non binding) We need a new RC due to the issues below.
I found a few issues while verifying the RC.
The first one is minor. The "[2]:" text mentions rc1 but links to rc0.
The second is blocking. While running the verification script, I found that
the sha256 file contains the wrong
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache
Iceberg Go version v0.1.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
8ca0bb7bdf7868bac4aca83f50db047d9bf0277c [1]
The source release rc0 is hosted at [2].
Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
Slight fix to the previous email: the text should say "The source release
*rc1* is hosted at [2]"
The link is correct, it's only the text that needed to be updated.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:43 AM Matt Topol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apac
