Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Okay, I’ve deployed the updated community page . Please let me know if anyone has problems with the link! The PR with these changes is #2904 . I also went through the list of members and updated all of the PMC memb

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Great, thanks for the help here! It sounds like there's consensus to move to the apache-iceberg community since the only responses have been positive so far. So let's plan on moving. Carl made me an admin, so I'll invite the other PMC members as admins and I'll also create an invite link that doe

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Hi, I was told the screenshot in my previous email doesn't show up, so sharing it as link instead https://gist.github.com/findepi/68e6a141d6ea06049c33e85c5ccd5835#gistcomment-3835460 Best PF On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:13 PM Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi, > > @Ryan Blue , where can one find at

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Hi, @Ryan Blue , where can one find at least a temporary signup link for apache-iceberg slack? Eduard, you can create a link that does not expire. You still need a new link every 2 thousand users joining. Below is an example what I see when creating a new invite link. [image: image.png] B

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

The default invite link expires after 30 days, that's why I was looking for alternatives. Maybe a slack admin can check if the invite link can be configured to not expire. On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 11:51 Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Ryan, > > you should be able to create a semi-permanent invite link. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Ryan, you should be able to create a semi-permanent invite link. in Trino, we are almost successful with a static link (see https://trino.io/slack.html) admittedly they still break on some occasions (not very often). I would imagine a custom sign up form could have some issues from time to time a

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

That's a great idea, Jacques. I agree that the Slack community should be controlled by the PMC. On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:41 AM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > My one recommendation would be that if you go off Apache infra that you > make sure all the PMC members are admins of the new account. > > On W

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

My one recommendation would be that if you go off Apache infra that you make sure all the PMC members are admins of the new account. On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 8:35 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > No problem, the site hasn't been deployed yet. > > I've also looked a bit into the invite issue for the apache-i

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

No problem, the site hasn't been deployed yet. I've also looked a bit into the invite issue for the apache-iceberg community and I think we should be able to set something up so that people can invite themselves. Thanks for raising this as an issue, Piotr. I didn't realize that the shared invite U

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

+1 Also I merged the change, sorry if that was premature. > On Jul 28, 2021, at 10:19 AM, Eduard Tudenhoefner wrote: > > +1 moving to the apache-iceberg slack > workspace > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:16 PM Ryan Blue > wrote: > Yes,

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

+1 from me too on moving to the apache-iceberg Slack space. Thanks On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 8:19 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner wrote: > +1 moving to the apache-iceberg slack > workspace > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:16 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Yes, we can update the

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

+1 moving to the apache-iceberg slack workspace On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:16 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Yes, we can update the Slack link. But we want to give everyone a chance > to speak up either in support or not before we make changes to how we > recommend comm

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Yes, we can update the Slack link. But we want to give everyone a chance to speak up either in support or not before we make changes to how we recommend communicating in the community. If you're in favor of moving to the apache-iceberg Slack space, please speak up! Ryan On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Could we just update the slack link to https://join.slack.com/t/apache-iceberg/ on the website (see PR#2882 )? On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:13 AM Jack Ye wrote: > Any updates on this? Given the fact of the currently broken invitation > link, I think we s

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Any updates on this? Given the fact of the currently broken invitation link, I think we should move asap. -Jack Ye On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:15 AM Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have opinion which Slack workspace this is in, as long as it's > easy to join. > Manual joining process is

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Hi, I don't have opinion which Slack workspace this is in, as long as it's easy to join. Manual joining process is not healthy for sure. Btw, the apache-iceberg is currently limited to @apache.org emails, which some people do not have (e.g. i do not). Will you be sharing an invite link or somethin

[DISCUSS] Moving to apache-iceberg Slack workspace

Hi everyone, A few weeks ago, we talked about whether to use a Slack workspace for Iceberg or whether to continue using the ASF's workspace. At the time, we thought it was possible for anyone to invite themselves to the ASF's Slack, so we thought it would be best to use the common one. But after t