Oh sorry - here is the correct link: https://lu.ma/ewx2kuis
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 10:11, Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> Thanks Christian,
>
> Good news! The link sent seems to be for an old Singapore Apache Iceberg
> meetup.
>
>
>
> El mié, 5 feb 2025 a las 10:06, Christian
Hey everyone,
Iceberg Meetups are coming to Europe!
We are planning to regularly organize meetups across Europe, the first
Meetup will be on the 2nd of April in Amsterdam starting at 17:00.
Please check our luma page for signup and call for speakers:
https://lu.ma/79xk5w5t
Best,
Christian
This vote has passed with the following results:
+1 votes: 8 binding and 8 non-binding
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
Thanks to everyone!
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 08:25, Christian Thiel
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> based on good feedback on the [DISCUSS] thread [1] I would like to raise
&g
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 07:34, Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> +1
>
> Op za 25 jan 2025 om 00:55 schreef Honah J. :
>
>> +1, thanks for driving this!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Honah
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM rdb...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at
+1 (non binding). Thanks Gabor!
Daniel Weeks schrieb am Fr. 24. Jan. 2025 um 17:15:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
>> +1. Thanks, Gabor! A bit more context, we synced on this spec change
>> during this morning's community catalog meeting and reached a general
>> cons
Hi everyone,
based on good feedback on the [DISCUSS] thread [1] I would like to raise
a vote to deprecate the `snapshot-id` field of the `SetStatisticsUpdate`
in the IRC. It is redundant with the `snapshot-id` field of the
`StatisticsFile` of each `SetStatisticsUpdate`.
Please vote in the ne
+1 non-binding
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] Can compile from source
[x] Ran tests
I also ran our integration test matrix with spark, pyiceberg, trino and
starrocks against a Lakekeeber based on the rc. Cross-build for
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, x86_64-unknown-l
+1 (non-binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] Can compile from source
[x] Ran tests
I also ran our integration test matrix with spark, pyiceberg, trino and
starrocks against a Lakekeeber based on the rc. Cross-build for
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, x86_64-unknown
Hey JB,
happy to help any way I can. Thanks for organizing this!
Best,
Christian
On 27. Nov 2024, at 07:52, Fokko Driesprong wrote:
Hey JB,
Thanks for organizing this. Happy to help!
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op wo 27 nov 2024 om 06:23 schreef karuppayya
mailto:karuppayya1...@gmail.com>>:
Hi JB,
+1 (non-binding) – looks like we are going in the right direction in rust!
Christian
On 19. Nov 2024, at 16:13, Jack Ye wrote:
+1
-Jack
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:45 AM Russell Spitzer
mailto:russell.spit...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:11 AM Fokko Driesprong
mailto:fo..
+1 for this as well – for us especially the REST TCK image would be nice.
From: Bryan Keller
Date: Thursday, 14. November 2024 at 17:13
To: dev@iceberg.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Iceberg DockerHub repository
+1 this would be great! Thanks JB.
-Bryan
On Nov 14, 2024, at 8:30 AM,
+1 (non-binding)
Ran the Lakekeeper Integration test suite with Spark without problems
Thanks!
Christian
Thank you for your Feedback everyone!
It would be great if we could get some more eyes from the community on the
server-side token exchange section at the bottom of the Document. Are we aware
of any OAuth2 secured implementations that provide tokens from the resource
server to the client apart
mitri.
[4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10753
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 4:12 AM Christian Thiel
wrote:
Dear everyone,
the Iceberg REST specification allows for different ways of Authentication,
OAuth2 is one of them. Until recently the OAuth2 /token endpoint was part of
the REST-spe
Hi Renji, thanks for picking it up! I don't have a preference either. Both
times work for me.
Von: Xuanwo
Gesendet: Friday, October 25, 2024 2:13:49 AM
An: dev@iceberg.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Iceberg Rust Sync Meeting Time
Hi,
My time is somewhat flexibl
+1 (non-binding). Great feature, thanks!
Von: Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:00:00 PM
An: dev@iceberg.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Endpoint for refreshing vended credentials
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 5:20 PM
+1 for rust sync. Thanks for the proposal Xuanwo. There are many open topics
and alignment in the sync can help to clarify scopes and dependencies to move
forward with iceberg-rust even faster.
Time is good for me.
Von: Kevin Liu
Gesendet: Wednesday, October 9, 2
Hi Dennis,
thanks for your initiative!
I believe externally owned Tables / Federation would enable a variety of new
use-cases in Data Mesh scenarios.
Personally, I currently favor pull based over push-based approaches (think
/changes Endpoint) for the following reasons:
* Less ambiguity fo
Dear everyone,
the Iceberg REST specification allows for different ways of Authentication,
OAuth2 is one of them. Until recently the OAuth2 /token endpoint was part of
the REST-spec together with datatypes required for the client-credential flow.
Both have since been removed from the spec for s
+ 1 (non-binding)
+1 (non-binding)
From: Xuanwo
Date: Wednesday, 14. August 2024 at 17:58
To: dev@iceberg.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.3.0 RC1
Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version 0.3.0.
The tag to be voted on is 0.3.0
21 matches
Mail list logo
