Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.3.0 RC1

Thanks a lot for the verification. I will try to improve this part to make our verification process much easier. On Mon, Aug 19, 2024, at 09:56, Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 for updating the verify script to run make test, or should we just ask > users to run `make test` without the scripts? > > On M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.3.0 RC1

+1 for updating the verify script to run make test, or should we just ask users to run `make test` without the scripts? On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 1:04 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I verified checksum/signatures/license/notice/no unexpected binary > files/ASF head

Re: [DISCUSS] Use iceberg-rust for PyIceberg Bucket Transform

Hi folks, thank you all for your input. It looks like there's a general agreement that this is a good idea. Given that Xuanwo has already put the scaffolding in place for pyiceberg_core , I've put up this PR to implement bucket_transform

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PyIceberg release 0.7.1

Hi everyone, I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1! Again, this patch release includes the following important bug fixes: * Fix `delete` to trace existing manifests when a data file is partially rewritten * Fix 'to_arrow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg Rust 0.3.0 RC1

+1 (binding) I verified checksum/signatures/license/notice/no unexpected binary files/ASF headers. I also ran make test. Also it seems like the Iceberg rust project has a verify script which does a build , and then users have