Re: [Proposal] Add support for Materialized Views in Iceberg

Thanks everyone for participating in the proposal and discussions. The vote is now closed and the proposal for separate view and table objects model has passed with the following counts: * 11 (+1) * 1 (0) * 0 (-1) I will start a separate thread for the next steps. Thanks, Walaa. On Fri, Apr 26,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.6.1rc3

Thanks everyone for voting! The 72 hours have passed, and a minimum of 3 binding votes have been cast: +1 Fokko Driesprong (binding) +1 Kevin Liu (non-binding) +1 Daniel Weeks (binding) +1 Hussein Awala (non-binding) +1 Amogh Jahagirdar (non-binding) +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (non-binding) +1 Honah

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.6.1rc3

+1 (binding) Thanks for getting this done! On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:45 AM Mehul Batra wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, Fokko for the docutils fix. > > * Verified signatures, checksums & license. > * Ran unit tests and integration tests. > > Warm regards, > Mehul Batra > > On Mon, Apr 22,

Fwd: Survey: To Understand the requirements regarding TRAINING & TRAINING CONTENT in your ASF project

Hello ASF people, As a member of ASF Training (Incubating) project I conduct some research related to training needs in ASF projects. This is also preparation for our presentation at the CoC conference in June in Bratislava where we discuss the results of the survey.The purpose is this: *We want t