Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Eduard Tudenhoefner
+1 On Fri 2. Feb 2024 at 04:56 Drew wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for bringing this up for PyIceberg Honah > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:35 PM Honah J. wrote: > >> Hello everyone >> >> Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I >> am starting this thread to gather feedba

Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Xuanwo
+1 non-binding Our community surrounding iceberg-python and iceberg-go is active and responsible. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024, at 09:35, Honah J. wrote: > Hello everyone > > Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I am > starting this thread to gather feedback on changin

Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Drew
+1 Thanks for bringing this up for PyIceberg Honah On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:35 PM Honah J. wrote: > Hello everyone > > Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I > am starting this thread to gather feedback on changing the CI settings for > iceberg-python and icebe

Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Matt Topol
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, 10:48 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:45 AM Jack Ye wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -Jack >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:35 PM Honah J. wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone >>> >>> Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting,

Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Renjie Liu
+1 On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:45 AM Jack Ye wrote: > +1 > > -Jack > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:35 PM Honah J. wrote: > >> Hello everyone >> >> Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I >> am starting this thread to gather feedback on changing the CI settings for >>

Re: [Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Jack Ye
+1 -Jack On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:35 PM Honah J. wrote: > Hello everyone > > Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I > am starting this thread to gather feedback on changing the CI settings for > iceberg-python and iceberg-go to only require approvals for new >

[Discuss] Change iceberg-python and iceberg-go CI Settings to only require approval for first time contributors

2024-02-01 Thread Honah J.
Hello everyone Inspired by our recent discussion regarding iceberg-rust's CI setting, I am starting this thread to gather feedback on changing the CI settings for iceberg-python and iceberg-go to only require approvals for new contributors. I think this will benefit contributors and align CI sett

Re: [DISCUSS] Change iceberg-rust CI Settings to only require approval for new github users

2024-02-01 Thread Honah J.
+1! I'll initiate a separate thread to discuss implementing a similar approach for iceberg-python and iceberg-go On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:02 PM Jack Ye wrote: > +1! And I think we should also do that for iceberg-go > > -Jack > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, 5:42 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > >> +1 for thi

Re: Re: Partition column order in rewrite manifests

2024-02-01 Thread Jack Ye
Just created https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9615 to track this. -Jack On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 11:43 AM Zach Dischner wrote: > That is a great idea! Would let anyone fine tune the sorting and > colocation behaviors they want for the metadata tree >

RE: Re: Partition column order in rewrite manifests

2024-02-01 Thread Zach Dischner
That is a great idea! Would let anyone fine tune the sorting and colocation behaviors they want for the metadata tree

Re: flink-1.18 maven files are not available

2024-02-01 Thread Steven Wu
Not available yet. Flink 1.18 support is only added in the upcoming Iceberg 1.5.0 release. On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:50 AM Jacek Juraszek wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve found out that that there is no > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/iceberg/iceberg-flink-runtime-1.18/ > . > Do you guys suppor

flink-1.18 maven files are not available

2024-02-01 Thread Jacek Juraszek
Hi, I’ve found out that that there is no https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/iceberg/iceberg-flink-runtime-1.18/ . Do you guys support different repo. Looks like code is there: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/main/flink/v1.18 It prevents me proper integration with iceberg from EMR

Re: [Discussion] Iceberg 1.5.0 release

2024-02-01 Thread Manu Zhang
I'd like to have some eyes on this PR to enhance the Java quickstart example. It will be great if we can get it in 1.5.0. Thanks, Manu On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:45 PM Brian Olsen wrote: > We’re adding on the url and then the docs release will be rea

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new Iceberg docs site in the main repository

2024-02-01 Thread Brian Olsen
Will do! I also have todos to make iceberg-docs read only On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:52 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > +1, > > Please also update the > https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#documentation-release after > that. > I will try it out for the 1.5.0 release. > > > - Ajantha > > On Wed, Ja

Re: [Discussion] Iceberg 1.5.0 release

2024-02-01 Thread Brian Olsen
We’re adding on the url and then the docs release will be ready! Should be merged today and the. I’ll explain the two steps you’ll need to do and be standing by during for the docs release. Thanks Ajantha! On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Ajantha > > About the JDB

Re: [Discussion] Iceberg 1.5.0 release

2024-02-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Ajantha About the JDBC catalog view support, I updated the PR, it's now ready for a new review round (I pinged Eduard). Regards JB On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:11 PM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > > Thanks to everyone who has added the PRs to the 1.5.0 milestone and got it > merged. > > https://github.c

Re: [Discussion] Iceberg 1.5.0 release

2024-02-01 Thread Ajantha Bhat
Thanks to everyone who has added the PRs to the 1.5.0 milestone and got it merged. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/37 Looks like we have 2 more things needed for release from the above milestone tag. Mostly they need review. - JDBC catalog view support (https://github.com/apache/iceber

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new Iceberg docs site in the main repository

2024-02-01 Thread Ajantha Bhat
+1, Please also update the https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#documentation-release after that. I will try it out for the 1.5.0 release. - Ajantha On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:26 AM Jack Ye wrote: > Sorry for the late vote, +1 and thanks for the great work! > > -Jack > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2