+1
Thanks,
Ajantha
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Avro 1.11.3 has been released, fixing CVE-2023-39410.
> We already updated to Avro 1.11.3 on main.
>
> About CVE, we also already use guava 32.1.3, fixing CVE-2023-2976.
>
> As the Avro CVE is classif
Hi guys,
Avro 1.11.3 has been released, fixing CVE-2023-39410.
We already updated to Avro 1.11.3 on main.
About CVE, we also already use guava 32.1.3, fixing CVE-2023-2976.
As the Avro CVE is classified high (see
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39410), I propose to bump to
Avro 1.11.3
This is one motivation case why I think it's useful to have a central place
for improvement proposals.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 21:17 Jan Kaul wrote:
> Up until 2 weeks ago the discussion took place in the Github issue but
> since then most people joined the discussion in the google doc. Since
>
Thank you for your comments. I should have provided a user story to make
the use case more clear.
While the WAP pattern is probably the most common usage for the
branching feature of iceberg tables, it could also be used in different
ways. The following is a user story showcasing the branching
Also, view metadata versions and (underlying) table snapshots/versions are
orthogonal concepts. For example, theoretically, one could time-travel in
views along two dimensions: view metadata version and underlying data
version. Hence, I do not think that data versioning in tables corresponds
exactl
