Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.1 (RC1)

+1 (non binding) I checked: - hash and signature are good - source distribution is good - run a quick test locally Thanks, Regards JB On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:28 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.1 > rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.4.1

Hi Eduard, I would like to include this change/revert for the 1.4.1 patch release. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8847 PR is not created yet. it should be a very small change in one file. Thanks, Steven On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Eduard > > It s

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.5.1 (RC1)

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.1 release. This is a patch release due to a bug that has been found . Smaller bugs also have been backported

Re: Iceberg Slack invite

Hey Lin, Can you try this link: https://join.slack.com/t/apache-iceberg/shared_invite/zt-2561tq9qr-UtISlHgsdY3Virs3Z2_btQ The link you mentioned is working for me, but I'm already part of the workspace. Can you share the error that you're seeing? Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 16 okt 2023 om 22:39 sc

Iceberg Slack invite

I’m evaluating Iceberg for my team’s transition to Open Table Formats. Is it possible to get access to the slack workspace? The invite link wouldn’t let me signup with my gmail account.

Re: PyIceberg 0.5.1 patch release

Thanks, Fokko! I merged the blocker so I think we're ready for a release candidate. On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 6:30 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > Hey everyone, > > This week we've discovered a serious bug when parsing SQL-like string > expressions (

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.4.1

Hi Eduard It sounds good to me. I have some dep upgrades I think it would be good to include (I'm working on testing/benchmark about that). Thanks to you, we already merged the most important. I'm doing a pass now. In terms of pure bug fix, I don't have anything in mind. Regards JB On Mon, Oct

[DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg 1.4.1

Hi everyone, I wanted to start a discussion to have a 1.4.1 patch release. We discovered a critical issue with split offsets in manifests that can result in corrupted metadata when those invalid offsets are read and then written back. Details with a proposed fix are described in #8834