On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
>> So in theory, together these could give us what we were looking for: do a
>> one-time conversion from MoinMoin to Confluence, and then a per-release
>> snapshot. But we would have to do some testing to see how well they
>> actually work.
>>
> So in theory, together these could give us what we were looking for: do a
> one-time conversion from MoinMoin to Confluence, and then a per-release
> snapshot. But we would have to do some testing to see how well they
> actually work.
>
It sounds like you're suggesting that we continue to main
Confluence has something called a Universal Wiki Converter importer, and it
supports MoinMoin:
https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/213
https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/wiki/display/UWC/UWC+MoinMoin+Notes
And there's a project for taking snapshots of Confluence:
http://code.google.c
> 1. I will be happy to stay with the XDOCS for official documentation,
> IF AND ONLY IF, We decide committers can edit and commit themselves
> without having to wait for a review.
>
This sounds very reasonable to me. +1
I really do not wish to dump the xdocs (since i had to sped that time
> writ
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:41 PM, John Sichi wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> http://hive.apache.org is up with content. Building forest requires
> java 1.5. There are two ways we can do this from now on.
>
> 1) Move the forest source (only) into our svn
> 2) Move th
There is a simple one line change to the forrest.properties file that makes
it possible to use Forrest with Java 6. I made this change for Pig here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1508
Thanks.
Carl
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, John Sichi wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:14 PM, E
On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
http://hive.apache.org is up with content. Building forest requires
java 1.5. There are two ways we can do this from now on.
1) Move the forest source (only) into our svn
2) Move the forest source and generated content into our SVN
With option1
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Namit Jain wrote:
> Let us punt it for now
>
> From: John Sichi [jsi...@facebook.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 6:08 PM
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: hive svn is up and hive.apache.org is up
&
Let us punt it for now
From: John Sichi [jsi...@facebook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 6:08 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: hive svn is up and hive.apache.org is up
A related question is whether we want to rename Java packages from
A related question is whether we want to rename Java packages from
org.apache.hadoop.hive.*
to
org.apache.hive.*
Apparently the HBase folks decided to punt on this one since it's quite
disruptive for in-flight patches, plugin loading, etc.
I'd suggest that we defer this until a "Hive 1.0" eff
Thanks for kicking this off. I propose we set the svn cutover date as Oct 25
(the next contributor meetup at Facebook), after the meetup wraps up. I think
we'll need to update the Hudson configuration as well. (We should drop the
pre-0.20 Hudson configurations too.)
If it's possible to take
11 matches
Mail list logo
