Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Hi Owen, Sounds good. Thanks for the update! Mark On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Hi Mark, >I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it > this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate > thread, I'll start a discussion

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Hi, We recently tried to upgrade to Hive 0.11 from 0.10 and noticed we needed to add patches for the following JIRAs to make Hive 0.11 work: - HIVE-4619. None of our MR queries worked without it - HIVE-4003. We ran into this bug in 0.10 also - Data Nucleus-related: At first we were only

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Hi Mark, I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0. -- Owen On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover wrote: > Hi folks, > A

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Hi folks, Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7 and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like. Thanks in advance! Mark On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: >

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport things into 11.X. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 wrote: > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for that. > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0? > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for that. Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0? ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate Teradata. 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo : > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not I will take it. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner wrote: > It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been > committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close. > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Tue

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close. Thanks, Mark On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, >I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put > together a release can

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

+ d...@bigtop.apache.org Hi Owen, I work on Apache Bigtop and we were recently discussinginclusion of Hive 0.11 in the next release of Bigtop - Bigtop 0.7. However, we

Re: Proposing a 0.11.1

Hi. Can I suggest to include HIVE-3772 (performance fix; committed to trunk) HIVE-4583 (OpenJDK7 support; all subtasks seem to be done) Thanks, Cos On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, >I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put > togethe