Hi Mark,
   I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it
this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate
thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0.

-- Owen


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
> and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
> context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport
> things
> > into 11.X.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <navis....@nexr.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> > that.
> > >
> > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> > >
> > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate
> Teradata.
> > >
> > > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If
> not I
> > > > will take it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <
> wagner.mar...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has
> > been
> > > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > All,
> > > >> >    I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to
> put
> > > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the
> process
> > of
> > > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> > > wanted to
> > > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an
> > 0.11.1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >    Owen
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to