I am able to load reviews as well, but looks like some experimentation is
going on. I see random pop-ups/features shows up from one page load to
another.
I don't know about visibility on FB side. But, I don't think mentioning on
this list may result in any resolution.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Wed, Ma
I'm able to load reviews again, but haven't yet tried submitting a new one
with Arc. Anyone else still experiencing problems?
Out of curiosity, was this problem visible on the FB side? Did mentioning
the issue on this list actually trigger the resolution?
Thanks.
Carl
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:5
Actually I was able to reproduce it...I had to be logged in to hit the
problem.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM, John Sichi wrote:
> Regarding the reviews.facebook.net website, I tried just now and it
> seems to be working for me; here's a screenshot of what I get for
> https://reviews.facebook.n
Doesn't work for me either. I see error message.
Ashutosh
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> Actually, I take that back. After logging in I'm now back to the original
> error message.
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks
Actually, I take that back. After logging in I'm now back to the original
error message.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for checking. I got the page to load again after clearing my
> browser's cache.
>
> Carl
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Jo
Hi John,
Thanks for checking. I got the page to load again after clearing my
browser's cache.
Carl
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM, John Sichi wrote:
> Regarding the reviews.facebook.net website, I tried just now and it
> seems to be working for me; here's a screenshot of what I get for
> http
Regarding the reviews.facebook.net website, I tried just now and it
seems to be working for me; here's a screenshot of what I get for
https://reviews.facebook.net/D3075:
http://i.imgur.com/umHlB.png
JVS
Me too.
arc diff --trace
..
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP'
with message '[HTTP/500]' in
/home/navis/bin/libphutil/src/future/http/base/BaseHTTPFuture.php:299
Stack trace:
#0 /home/navis/bin/libphutil/src/future/http/https/HTTPSFuture.php(95):
BaseHTTPFutur
Has the phabricator site stopped working for anyone else? As of today I'm
not longer able to view review requests. For example:
https://reviews.facebook.net/D3075
Produces the following output:
Fatal error: Undefined class constant 'COMMITTED' in
/var/www/reviews.facebook.net/phabricator/src/a
Made some progress on using arc/phab on ubuntu. epriestley helped a ton
over at #phabricator irc channel. Thanks, Evan!
Now, able to make arc work on ubuntu, but seems like jira integration is
broken. Hit the following problem:
$arc diff —jira HIVE-3008
PHP Fatal error: Class 'ArcanistDifferenti
Problem while using arc on ubuntu
$ arc patch D2871
ARC: Cannot mix P and A
UNIX: No such file or directory
Any ideas whats up there.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 17:19, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> Just throwing this out there. The phabricator IRC has more people and
> is usually more
Just throwing this out there. The phabricator IRC has more people and
is usually more active then Hive IRC.
#JustSaying...
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Hit a new problem with arc today:
>
> Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'Host returned
> HT
I think as an Apache project, using code review tools outside apache should
never be a "requirement". I agree that arc/phab are great tools, and they
help the patch/review process a lot. But I think what is essential for long
term sustainability as a project is to lower the entry barriers for
contr
Hit a new problem with arc today:
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'Host returned
HTTP/200, but invalid JSON data in response to a Conduit method call:
Warning: Unknown: POST Content-Length of 9079953 bytes exceeds the
limit of 8388608 bytes in Unknown on line 0
for(;;);{
I think the most practical solution is try and use arc/phab and then
if there is a problem fall back to Jira and do it the old way.
Edward
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
> +1 to switching over to Git.
>
> As for the rest of the Phabricator/Gerrit/Reviewboard discussion, I
I have arc working on linux. Fedora core 12 I think.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan
wrote:
> Is mac only supported OS ? Arc doesn't work for me on linux, which is
> unfortunate since thats where I do all my testing.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:37, John S
Oops, actually adding d...@fb.com this time.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:37 PM, John Sichi wrote:
> CC'ing David Recordon, who can probably help with a point of contact
> for coordinating future Phabricator upgrades.
>
> It looks like the test plan problem mentioned below (which affects
> git, but
arc works fine on Linux for me. What problem are you encountering?
JVS
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan
wrote:
> Is mac only supported OS ? Arc doesn't work for me on linux, which is
> unfortunate since thats where I do all my testing.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Wed, Apr 11,
I took a look at the 14.patch file in JIRA; the last hunk for
ivy/common-configurations.xml ends in "\ No newline at end of file",
and I think that's what is screwing it up (since that immediately
precedes ivysettings.xml). If I delete that line, the patch applies
(although it causes a reject for
Is mac only supported OS ? Arc doesn't work for me on linux, which is
unfortunate since thats where I do all my testing.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:37, John Sichi wrote:
> CC'ing David Recordon, who can probably help with a point of contact
> for coordinating future Phabricator
CC'ing David Recordon, who can probably help with a point of contact
for coordinating future Phabricator upgrades.
It looks like the test plan problem mentioned below (which affects
git, but not svn) was introduced when the reviews.facebook.net
Phabricator server was upgraded Feb 23. I've committ
+1 to switching over to Git.
As for the rest of the Phabricator/Gerrit/Reviewboard discussion, I think
we should pick this up again at the contributor meeting on Wednesday.
Thanks.
Carl
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> +1 on moving away from arc/phabricator. It works
Hi John,
For HIVE-2646: the diagnostics aren't great, but I think it's just
> choking on a patch that needs to be rebased, since as Kevin says, if I
> download the latest .patch from JIRA and apply that with patch -p0, I
> get the correct failure message. So just ask the author to rebase
> again
Hi John,
> Regarding the test plans: Carl, could you be more specific about what
> is going wrong so I can attempt to reproduce the problem?
>
At some point Arc started requiring that the commit message contain a "Test
Plan" string, or maybe this has always been a requirement and it was just
au
+1 on moving away from arc/phabricator. It works great when it works, but
most of the time it doesnt work.
Ashutosh
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:57, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Edward Capriolo
> wrote:
> > If we are going to switch from fabricator we just might as we
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> If we are going to switch from fabricator we just might as well go
> back to not using anything. Review board was really clunky and
> confusing.
I'm mostly +1 to that. If no one is supporting phabricator, then it
won't work for long. Pers
gt; are just suggestions.
>
> From: Carl Steinbach mailto:c...@cloudera.com>>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:10:44 -0700
> To: Microsoft Office User mailto:kevinwilf...@fb.com>>
> Cc: "dev@hive.apache.org<mailto:dev@hive.apache.org>"
> mailto:dev@hive.apache.org
t; From: Carl Steinbach
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:10:44 -0700
> To: Microsoft Office User
> Cc: "dev@hive.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Problems with Arc/Phabricator
>
> Ok, I'll submit an issue. But then what? Who is going to fix it? Perhaps in
> the meantime
habricator on Hive,
> these are just suggestions.
>
> From: Carl Steinbach
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:10:44 -0700
> To: Microsoft Office User
> Cc: "dev@hive.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Problems with Arc/Phabricator
>
> Ok, I'll submit an issue. But th
mailto:dev@hive.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Problems with Arc/Phabricator
Ok, I'll submit an issue. But then what? Who is going to fix it? Perhaps in the
meantime we should just switch back to using reviewboard while we wait for Arc
and Phabricator to mature as open source projects.
Ok, I'll submit an issue. But then what? Who is going to fix it? Perhaps in
the meantime we should just switch back to using reviewboard while we wait
for Arc and Phabricator to mature as open source projects.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Kevin Wilfong wrote:
> There's a list of ways to rep
There's a list of ways to report issues/get help on the side bar of this
site http://phabricator.org/
It suggests #phabricator as the best
place to get help with issues.
On 4/10/12 5:42 PM, "Carl Steinbach" wrote:
>Arc won't let me apply the patch for HIVE-2646. I've also noticed some
>other p
32 matches
Mail list logo
