[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siying Dong updated HIVE-1794:
--
Attachment: HIVE-1794.1.patch
1. Fix the issue that Or and And cannot accept java's boolean
2. add unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siying Dong updated HIVE-1794:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> GenericUDFOr and GenericUDFAnd cannot receive boolean typed objec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siying Dong reassigned HIVE-1794:
-
Assignee: Siying Dong
> GenericUDFOr and GenericUDFAnd cannot receive boolean typed object
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932354#action_12932354
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-78:
Driver:
//do the authorization check
385 if (Hi
GenericUDFOr and GenericUDFAnd cannot receive boolean typed object
--
Key: HIVE-1794
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1794
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vaibhav Aggarwal updated HIVE-1790:
---
Attachment: HIVE-1790-1.patch
> Patch to support HAVING clause in Hive
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932318#action_12932318
]
Vaibhav Aggarwal commented on HIVE-1790:
I have added test cases and have uploaded a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siying Dong updated HIVE-1783:
--
Attachment: HIVE-1783.2.patch
Added a unit test.
I ran the test with and without the patch applied and t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siying Dong updated HIVE-1783:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> CommonJoinOperator optimize the case of 1:1 join
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932306#action_12932306
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-78:
Few minor comments:
1. Can you add more comments in M* files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932280#action_12932280
]
Carl Steinbach commented on HIVE-1790:
--
The test tables are created by the QTestUtil.cr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932275#action_12932275
]
Vaibhav Aggarwal commented on HIVE-1790:
Hey Carl
Do you know how to access the sch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932219#action_12932219
]
Carl Steinbach commented on HIVE-1790:
--
@Vaibhav: can you please add some test cases to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932214#action_12932214
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-1642:
--
come more minor comments:
1203 //Qualify the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932211#action_12932211
]
Vaibhav Aggarwal commented on HIVE-1790:
Hi
I think the patch is ready for review.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932210#action_12932210
]
Pradeep Kamath commented on HIVE-842:
-
I have tested this patch after making HIVE-1526 wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carl Steinbach updated HIVE-1790:
-
Component/s: Query Processor
Fix Version/s: 0.7.0
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Impro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932175#action_12932175
]
John Sichi commented on HIVE-1785:
--
As mentioned above, we don't want to make a breaking ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932168#action_12932168
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-1642:
--
TaskGraphWalker:
if(!(nd instanceof Task)){
remove TaskGraphWalker
--
Key: HIVE-1793
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1793
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Query Processor
Reporter: Namit Jain
Assign
Is there any thought on an effective way to make this work? I have written a
first pass at a udf to do this here: http://pastie.org/1300279 but for some
reason it keeps giving me nullpointerexceptions.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932132#action_12932132
]
Liyin Tang commented on HIVE-1642:
--
There are 2 kinds of backup. 1) task level 2) branch le
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932112#action_12932112
]
Namit Jain commented on HIVE-1642:
--
Let us talk about it - I dont think Tasks need to be se
23 matches
Mail list logo
