Hi Jesper,
sorry, but I do not know if there are reasons why the current grammar does not allow "--1"?
@Paul, Guillaume... I guess you can shed some light on this?
-Pascal
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Februar 2016 um 08:55 Uhr
Von: "Jesper Steen Møller"
An: dev@groovy.apache.org
Betreff:
On 27.02.2016 19:29, Christophe Henry wrote:
[...]
public class CustomApplication extends Application
{
private static instance @Override void onCreate()
{
super.onCreate()
instance =this }
public trait ApplicationUtilities
{
public ContextgetAppl
On 28.02.2016 12:55, Jesper Steen Møller wrote:
[...]
* Memory: Is this an issue I should be focusing on — and is there a
test to baseline against?
no test you can baseline against imho. The current approach is keeping
everything in memory and uses that for the cst part, which is build
Hi Jochen and Henry
> On 29. feb. 2016, at 11.29, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
> On 27.02.2016 19:29, Christophe Henry wrote:
> [...]
>> public class CustomApplication extends Application
>> {
>> private static instance
[…]
>> public ContextgetApplicationContext(){return
>> instance.ap
On 27.02.2016 05:26, Aseem Bansal wrote:
Hi Konstantin Boudnik
Are the things on groovy-lang not considered originating from Apache
premises?
If we link to Mr Hakis blog, and that is seen as Docs, then we have
external Docs, which do not originate from the ASF. In my opinion no
problem, si
On 29.02.2016 11:52, Jesper Steen Møller wrote:
Hi Jochen and Henry
On 29. feb. 2016, at 11.29, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 27.02.2016 19:29, Christophe Henry wrote:
[...]
public class CustomApplication extends Application
{
private static instance
[…]
public ContextgetAppli
Hi Jochen
> On 29. feb. 2016, at 11.39, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
> On 28.02.2016 12:55, Jesper Steen Møller wrote:
> [...]
>> * Memory: Is this an issue I should be focusing on — and is there a
>>test to baseline against?
>
> no test you can baseline against imho. The current approach is k
Hi Jochen
> On 29. feb. 2016, at 12.05, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 29.02.2016 11:52, Jesper Steen Møller wrote:
>> Those semantics should be easy enough to cope with, if only the grammar (and
>> taste!) would allow it.
>
> Why does the grammar not allow it? The grammar does imho, but the later
Sorry for a delay in the answer...
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:01PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
> On 27.02.2016 05:26, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> >Hi Konstantin Boudnik
> >
> >Are the things on groovy-lang not considered originating from Apache
> >premises?
Where the code for groovy-lang is hosted? Tha
2016-02-29 18:37 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
> Sorry for a delay in the answer...
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:01PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> >
> > On 27.02.2016 05:26, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> > >Hi Konstantin Boudnik
> > >
> > >Are the things on groovy-lang not considered originating from Apa
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:40PM, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> 2016-02-29 18:37 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
>
> > Sorry for a delay in the answer...
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:01PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> > >
> > > On 27.02.2016 05:26, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> > > >Hi Konstantin Boudnik
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
