Hi Jochen > On 29. feb. 2016, at 12.05, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > On 29.02.2016 11:52, Jesper Steen Møller wrote: >> Those semantics should be easy enough to cope with, if only the grammar (and >> taste!) would allow it. > > Why does the grammar not allow it? The grammar does imho, but the later parts > of the compiler are not prepared for that kind of trouble and either fail > with BUG! messages (I had an NPE in one case for example) or produces code, > which does not work. Right, I actually didn’t check, just assumed is wasn’t in the grammar since it wasn’t supported (and it’s not at all supported in the Antlr4 grammar, yet). I try not to look at groovy.g too much ;-)
-Jesper
