Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
Thank you. I'd rather we hyphenate all words in the artifact id. It's easier to read. Also, we got rid of the additional prefixes so we'd only ever have the format `grails-X`. If we had prefixes to group them together, I'd agree, but since we don't, why not make it easier to read? On Fri, Mar

Re: Grails Website Refresh - Some Initial Questions

2025-03-21 Thread Martyn Duffy
Hey everyone, Thanks so much for the feedback so far - good themes emerging that I’ll use to anchor the next round of design explorations. One area I’d love your input on: learning resources. Are there any standout video tutorials or guides you’d recommend featuring on the new site? I’m especial

Re: Grails Website Refresh - Some Initial Questions

2025-03-21 Thread Justin Dodson
I've been considering making an updated Grails series for some time. I'm not aware of any modern learning resources out there beyond Grails 3. I'd be happy to try and put something together if no one has any other resource recommendations. *Regards,* *Justin Dodson* *(913) 267 - 2671* On Fri, M

Re: [VOTE] Group Id, Artifact Id rename + Views Gradle Plugins Proposal

2025-03-21 Thread James Fredley
+1 James On 2025/03/21 21:59:49 James Daugherty wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward > with the maven coordinate changes so we can begin snapshot builds under the > ASF namespace. > > I've done my best to capture everyone's feedback

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
1. Did you mean to say artifact ids instead of groupIds? 2. We should decide on noun vs plural forms. I'm personally a fan of the noun approach. What are other people's thoughts? 3. I named it model because all that library does is expose the classpath. I could see it being used for other purpose

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
I updated the PR. On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:02 PM Mattias Reichel wrote: > Thank you James! > My question was more regarding why two of them are collapsed: > - databinding > - datastore > vs non-collapsed: > - data-mapping > > Den fre 21 mars 2025 kl 17:30 skrev James Daugherty > : > > > Data bi

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
Data binding & data mapping are definitely related. Binding is transforming one source format to another. I.e. form url encoding being parsed and populating properties on a class file. It only deals with copying data from a source to a target. I would still view them separately since data mappi

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Fredley
This has had the highest participation of any Grails conversation over the last ~9 months, which is exciting to see. The goal of this step is to move to Apache groupids, which are required to setup snapshot publishing at ASF, which will allow us to resume development with the 18 migrated git re

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
I've updated the pull request for the following: artifactId: grails-gradle-console -> grails-console artifactId: grails-gradle-model changed package from model -> gradle artifactId: grails-security-spring -> grails-spring-security artifactId: grails-rest-responder -> grails-rest-transforms groupId

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread Mattias Reichel
Thank you James! My question was more regarding why two of them are collapsed: - databinding - datastore vs non-collapsed: - data-mapping Den fre 21 mars 2025 kl 17:30 skrev James Daugherty : > Data binding & data mapping are definitely related. Binding is > transforming one source format to ano

[VOTE] Group Id, Artifact Id rename + Views Gradle Plugins Proposal

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
Hi Everyone, As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward with the maven coordinate changes so we can begin snapshot builds under the ASF namespace. I've done my best to capture everyone's feedback under the pull request for this proposal here: https://github.com/apach

Re: Grails Website Refresh - Some Initial Questions

2025-03-21 Thread Justin Dodson
Fantastic idea, Andrew! I, for one, would love to see an ideas from a designer rather than design by committee. Although, if the site refresh is needed quickly then perhaps voting between the two is the only option. Not sure on the timeline for this? I’d imagine it isn’t super pressing. - Ju

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread Mattias Reichel
Excuse a non-native english speaker, should these be treated the same or differently? databinding datamapping datastore Den fre 21 mars 2025 kl 16:38 skrev James Daugherty : > I've updated the pull request for the following: > > artifactId: grails-gradle-console -> grails-console > artifactId: gr

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
I'll start a vote thread in 3 hours if there isn't any more feedback so we can get snapshot builds working next week. It's rather critical we get this done since we still have major grails 7 issues remaining to address before a RC can be made. If we don't get snapshot publishing completed in Marc

Re: [DISCUSS] Group Id & Artifact Id Renames

2025-03-21 Thread Michael Yan
IMO, just changing org.grails to org.apache.grails is the fastest way to release M4. On 2025/03/21 17:52:18 James Daugherty wrote: > I'll start a vote thread in 3 hours if there isn't any more feedback so we > can get snapshot builds working next week. > > It's rather critical we get this done s

Re: [VOTE] Group Id, Artifact Id rename + Views Gradle Plugins Proposal

2025-03-21 Thread James Daugherty
Michael: can you give a reasons to why you disagree? On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM Michael Yan wrote: > [-1],specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10 > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:02 AM James Daugherty > wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that