Hi,
would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could
be included
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.lin
----
> *From:* Romain Manni-Bucau
> *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:47 PM
> *Subject:* Re: XBean Release?
>
> Hi,
>
> would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could
> be included
>
> *Romai
+1 (non binding)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/3/8 M
is this snapshot repo an issue? it is not used and that's the apache
snapshot repo (should even be in the apache parent pom IIRC)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.c
l;
The 2 seems less correct but in practise i think it is more efficient - we
can do both too (testing URLClassLoader and if not adding MANIFEST.MF
listing)
wdyt?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it
Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release?
>
>
> javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2
>
> is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway
> and just keep it in
e if nobody
shouts before
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
committed the fix,
it needed a workaround for surefire which doesn't respect getURLs semantic
with some config (the one of xbean for instance).
i added a property to deactivate it too if needed.
hope i didn't break anything
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https:
+1
Le 23 mai 2013 18:45, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Jarek Gawor
> > To: dev
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013, 17:23
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try
> >
> >T hings look pretty good to me +
+1 to remove xbean asm3 shade and upgrade xbean to support asm4 shade (in
progress)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in
Mainly a real complete support of Java 7 IMO
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com
Hi
i like to get it by default,
@Jarek: rat can be skipped with a system property, isn't it enough for dev
time?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
+1
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/5/30 Forrest Xia
>
s mentioned before is to run it in the deploy phase as it
> still will catch the problems early but won't fail builds for silly
> reasons.
>
> Jarek
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > i like to get it b
Hi
Is it possible to release xbean 3.15?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> Go ahead and thanks
>
> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:21, "David Blevins" a
+1
Le 7 nov. 2013 07:12, "Alan D. Cabrera" a écrit :
> +1 Looks good.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:55 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> > Ok, release rolled!
> >
> > Binaries:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> > ht
+1
Le 14 nov. 2013 06:29, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" a écrit :
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/13/2013 11:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release.
>> The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata
>> problems.
>> See https://
Hi
how far are we from getting bval 1.1 and interceptors 1.2 spec jars?
I remember I saw few jiras but no idea what's the current status.
It would be mandatory for next bval release.
I can help a bit if needed, just shout!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog:
pushed them
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec
and
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com
+1, would be great to release batchee soon so we need it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/19 Mark Struberg :
> Hi folks!
>
> The Apache BatchE
the others for bval 1.1.0-alpha
anyone could start it?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
bval spec jar passed tck + sig test (checked few minutes ago)
** missed few commit to pass, I'll push them in the morning
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/22 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> bval spec jar passed t
SignatureTest report
Base version:
Tested version:
Check mode: src [throws normalized]
Constant checking: on
STATUS:Passed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Hi Mark,
"the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
"This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
requires Java 6 or higher. "
Not sure it is a blocker or not.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibuca
+1 for me, thanks Mark!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/26 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> indeed, it should.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/1
Hi Kevin,
java 7 requires Java 7 as runtime or build version? Basically I see
nothing in javaee 7 which could prevent to build against j6 almost the
whole stack.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github
for new spec I don't see how j7 could help to solve anything, for old
it is possible. But well this is not blocking at all IMO so maybe no
need to discuss it a lot in this thread ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedi
Signature are available here
https://java.net/projects/jbatch/sources/jsr-352-git-repository/show/JSR352.Tests.TCK?rev=6126835af9eb5dedb24825826820d1b7476e78e9
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github
+1, iirc bval should need it too
Btw alpha or not? Not sure it is relevant for spec jars without much logic
Le 10 janv. 2014 19:28, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ship an alpha version of the CDI-1.1 api jar.
>
> We need this for TomEE, BatchEE and of course for OpenWebBeans.
>
we need to check shouldn't be that long, always weird to get alpha for
"spcificed" APIs as a user.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/1
Hi guys,
do we upgrade xbean shade to asm 5? we'll be mandatory very soon for
openejb, openwebbeans...
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
s, at least saying "please replace these
jars" would be nice even if the whole stack is not yet released
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-26
if nobody is available I can have a try end of this week or next week
depending the time I get.
Any blocking?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-26 19:42
FYI for openjpa https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2487 ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-31 7:41 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
will not change for net release (same for 3) I
think it is no more mandatory to keep it.
If there is any issue please shout ASAP since I'd like to release 3.17
very soon.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmanni
esome ;))
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.17/
Hope I didn't do something wrong since I'm not yet really familiar
with releases.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rma
Closing this vote with 8 +1s (4 bindings) and no other votes.
I'll publish the binaries ASAP.
Thx to everyone for voting.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmanni
just released binaries (got ldapi issues to log on nexus before), they
should hit central soon.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-03 22:17 GMT+02:00
So last release was fine :)
well keeping them added us a lot of work and would have mean adding an
asm facade which is rarely a good idea when asm is so much used as in
our code.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com
is not done in resolver
where before invoke was passing correct types. Didnt check the spec
about it.
Not sure the work needed to go this way, any idea how we can go further?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in
please shout if it is an issue to not create a shade here.
PS: if it is ok do we do a release? TomEE will need it and if we can't
provide it fast enough tomee will use a "release fork" but we need to know
about it
feedbacks welcomed ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannib
ntent/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1001/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.18/
Vote open 72h.
[ ] +1 release this
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)
Here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibuca
Hi
With 5 +1s (3 bindings) and no -1/0 this vote passes. Here are the +1:
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Guillaume Nodet
Mark Struberg
David Blevins
Romain Manni-Bucau
I'll promote the repo now.
Thanks for your votes!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpres
just changing subject, sorry for the spam
Hi
>
> With 5 +1s (3 bindings) and no -1/0 this vote passes. Here are the +1:
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Guillaume Nodet
> Mark Struberg
> David Blevins
> Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> I'll promote the repo now.
>
> Th
Hello guys,
any plan to release (even in alpha since we don't valid signatures
against TCKs) javaee 7 artifacts?
I'm thinking in particular about:
1) concurrency utilities for ee
2) json processing
maybe cdi 1.1, interceptors 1.2 too.
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmanni
IIRC we can while we don't tag it as final (beta is fine)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-07-08 16:29 GMT+02:00 Jarek Gawor :
> No, we don't
be able to upgrade it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
onimo-1002/
vote will be opened for 3 days or until 3 pmc votes are obtained as usually.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-07-20 9:40 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi guys
>
> I'd like to call a vote for ger
Hi
No that's true, here it is:
pub 2048R/3134B697 2014-03-29
uid Romain Manni-Bucau
sig 33134B697 2014-03-29 Romain Manni-Bucau
sub 2048R/880A5772 2014-03-29
sig 3134B697 2014-03-29 Romain Manni-Bucau
-BEGI
should be done
PS: here the hack to checkout KEYS only:
$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ --depth empty
$ cd geronimo/
$ svn up KEYS
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https
The vote got 5+1s (3 bindings) so it passed :)
Thank you all for the votes, I'll pushed binaries on central just after
this mail.
PS: any other action needed?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
G
Hi Hendrik
Awesome! Didnt target it before being web profile compliant but great if
already in place
Le 1 août 2014 09:51, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> just saw that geronimo/tomee ships with Javamail 1.4. If there is some
> interest i will volunteer to work on a 1.5 implementation. Just wa
Hi
wondered about a release train?
was thinking about jcdi 1.1, interceptor, json, and few others. Main
question is: can we test signatures or do we miss some tck parts?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in
Not yet
Just catch as much as test as you can and it will be good for an
alpha/beta release (ie not certified)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-04 18
looks a good start, can you either create a PR (
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/tree/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4
) or a patch and attach it to the issue please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in
nment (needs to be orchestrated from a single thread).
Would it bother you?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
BTW found another bug: we return a list but a set of the list doesn't
return the same thing so we surely miss something
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Ok, I'm removing it now since I didn't get much feedbacks. And we need
to move ahead.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-08 19:46 GMT+02:00 Ro
: 3)
cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
for instance it x3 the execution time.
But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.
Any -1?+1?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rma
en 72h.
[ ] +1 release this
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)
Here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-20 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi,
>
scans)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-23 18:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Is there an easy way to fix those OSGi issues? If so +0, if there is no
>
in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-23 20:07 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera :
> Is your signature in h
Is there a sync process (from svn to dist seems the way to keep track
of changes) or a way to get one?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-24 20:50 GMT+02
) 4.x x > 0 will
make it more usable (OSGi, this if you think it is bad etc...). Main
purpose was to get a first release fixing linking time and respecting
the constructor contract
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com
Counting votes it seems it passed:
+1s: Alan D Cabrera, David Blevins, Romain Manni-Bucau
+0: Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Mark Struberg
-1: no
thank you all for your votes.
PS: ones having identified some issues would be welcomed to at least
open a jira explaining it and potentially proposing a fix
alpha jcache one this week since jcs needs
it to release 2.0
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-26 12:22 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> T
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-28 8:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> I am not quite sure about that. Would need to dig all the download links
changes are on central ;) but work fine with tomee
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-28 9:25 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> +1
>
> The move
+1
Le 30 août 2014 21:04, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> I've just did run the releasing of a few EE7 spec artifacts
>
> * geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec
> * geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec
> * geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec
> * geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
> * geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec/
> * geroni
+1 forgot about it but we can release johnzon then
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 10:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> Hey Mark,
>
>
well it should be the case by spec
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 17:38 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> checked JSON spec.
> RAT i
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-07 14:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> As we miss the rat stuff in our releases I was about to giv
+1, thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-11 9:13 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> genesis is our parents project collector for all
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-17 21:37 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> Here comes the release train again after fixing the build
+1 for me
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-17 8:42 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> As you might have seen I improved the performance of xbean-finder quite a bit
> with only a few l
Hi Mark,
Don't we want the same hack in FileArchive before releasing?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-19 9:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> I've rolled a build for
should be ok
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-19 12:50 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Of course, if this has the same limitation then just go on and fix it the
> same way.
>
> Just ping me
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-21 11:11 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
>
> I've rolled another build (take2) for Geronimo XBean-4.1.
>
> This release mainly brings a
Hello
http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html
Le 30 oct. 2014 21:31, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit :
> How can i get access to the JEE6 TCKs (especially the one for javamail
> 1.4 which is JSR 919)?
> Possible?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
>
+1
Le 9 nov. 2014 00:10, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit :
> I did some work on Javamail 1.4 and want to discuss the changes
> before commit them:
>
> - Replaced greenmail with apache james
> - Added new testcases, more to come ...
> - Fixed APOP authentication for POP3
> - Starttls is now also working f
2014-11-11 9:13 GMT+01:00 Eric Charles :
> Good to see you are eating some Apache James here, but James would also love
> to use Apache Geronimo Mail, which could lead to dependencies clash (james
> depending on geronimo depending on james...).
>
>
using crossed versions it is ok
>
> On 11/10/201
No real time to help but +1
Le 27 nov. 2014 12:39, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit :
> Is there a running CI/buildserver setup for Geronimo?
>
> If not i like to setup Jenkins for Javamail and Specs CI builds.
> Maybe also xbean needs a CI setup?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendr
1.8.0 sounds good. If anyone with a setup to run TCKs can do it it
would be awesome otherwise we can do a 1.8.0-alpha-1 without this
check.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00
Hi
Yep, I asked him. We'll need it anyway, at least for tomee javaee-api 7 jar.
Le 18 déc. 2014 14:51, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> All,
>
> A few months ago I worked out a spec JAR for JMS 2.0 APIs, the purpose
> being to include it in apache projects. You can see the code here:
>
> https://gi
The same ActiveMQ guy (Taylor IIRC).
More sure way to contribute it is to create a patch and attach it to a
geronimo issue (surely
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com
now, so I couldn't respond on the ticket.
>
> John
>
> On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 8:00:33 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>> The same ActiveMQ guy (Taylor IIRC).
>>
>> More sure way to contribute it is to create a patch and attach it to a
>&g
applied, thanks again John!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-02 18:41 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> Ok, PR looks better now:
>
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2/files
>
&g
AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
batch release like last time?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01
Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
I see:
-> jms 2 api
-> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
-> jta 1.2 api
-> jaxrs 2 api
-> ejb 3.2 api
All in alpha excepted current javamail version
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@r
on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully
next week, for sure the one after)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor :
> Is there any update
no blocker in my side excepted time so that's why I target the ~10th
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-28 13:58 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor :
> I was just wondering if the beginning of next
for javamail we need both
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-04 12:51 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev :
> do we plan to release javamail alpha specs only or specs and impl? i
> ll vote for both
>
>
ource/javadoc/etc yourself.
My key can be found at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}
here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://
I think we'll re-release jms next month anyway so not blocking (others) IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-10 17:48 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> -1 (non binding)
>
> Martyn has a few
was in my todo list for alpha-1 but forgot so since I assume this
error I'll take it for the alpha-2 I'll run this week end.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-12 13:53 GMT+01:00 Martyn Tay
Ok so here the counts:
+1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding
0: no
-1: 2 non-bindings
Considering -1 were for an alpha we'll rerelease super fast this vote
passes and I'll assume to rerun one for jms 2 api ASAP.
Thanks you all guys to have reviewed it!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmanni
1 - 100 of 1612 matches
Mail list logo
