AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec batch release like last time?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: > Martyn, > > Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if > possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a > release. > > John > > On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. >> >> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS >> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS >> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of >> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 >> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with >> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to >> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, >> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. >> >> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me >> know. >> >> Kind regards >> Martyn >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6 >> >
