Thanks everyone for the feedback
This RC is cancelled and a new one will be created
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 2:42 AM Leonard Xu wrote:
> Thanks Sergey for driving this!
>
> -1(binding) as we discussed on the web PR[1], looking forward next RC.
>
> Best,
> Leonard
> [1] https://github.com/apache/f
Thanks Sergey for driving this!
-1(binding) as we discussed on the web PR[1], looking forward next RC.
Best,
Leonard
[1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/707#discussion_r1471090061
> 2024年1月30日 上午8:17,Sergey Nuyanzin 写道:
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candida
Hi David, thanks for your feedback
> This release introduces (I assume experimental, like Flink’s statement
around Java compatibility but we have not documented this as experimental)
support for Java 17. I see
https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/deployment/java_compatibility/
Hi,
[x] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
I wanted clarifications on our thinking around the following.
In the source code
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/releases/tag/v3.1.2-rc2
* This release introduces (I assume experimental, like Flink’s st
+1 (non-binding)
- Validated checksum hash
- Verified signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build the source with Maven and jdk11
- Verified web PR
- Check that the jar is built by jdk8
Best,
Hang
Jiabao Sun 于2024年1月30日周二 10:52写道:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> - Release n
+1(non-binding)
- Release notes look good
- Tag is present in Github
- Validated checksum hash
- Verified signature
- Verified web PR and left minor comments
Best,
Jiabao
On 2024/01/30 00:17:54 Sergey Nuyanzin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the ve
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding:
* Sergey Nuyanzin (non-binding)
* Dawid (binding)
* Martijn (binding)
* Danny (binding)
There are no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
Best regards,
Martijn
O
Hello,
+1 (binding)
- Release notes look good
- Verified signatures and hashes
- Verified there are no binaries in the source archive
- NOTICE/Licenses look good
- Built source
- Tag exists in Github
- Contents of Maven repo look good
- Reviewed web PR
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:04 PM M
+1 (binding)
- Validated hashes
- Verified signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build the source with Maven
- Verified licenses
- Verified web PR
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>- verified signatures and checksums
>
+1 (binding)
* verified signatures and checksums
* built from sources
* the PR looks good
* the artifacts to be published look fine
* checked files diff to the 1.16.0 release tag
Best,
Dawid
On 19/12/2022 12:17, Sergey Nuyanzin wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
- Validated hashes and signature
-
+1 (non-binding)
- Validated hashes and signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build from sources with Maven
- Verified licenses
one nitpick: it seems a link to the tag is broken (number 5)
I guess it should be this one
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/r
11 matches
Mail list logo