Re: [VOTE] FLIP-491: BundledAggregateFunction for batched aggregation

+1 (binding) Op ma 24 feb 2025 om 11:06 schreef Stefan Richter > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Stefan > > On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you, > > Fabian > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Than

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-491: BundledAggregateFunction for batched aggregation

+1 (binding) Thanks, Stefan On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you, > Fabian > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for working on this FLIP. > > > > Best regards, > > Timo > > > > On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan She

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-491: BundledAggregateFunction for batched aggregation

+1 (binding) Thank you, Fabian On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for working on this FLIP. > > Best regards, > Timo > > On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes > > adding

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-491: BundledAggregateFunction for batched aggregation

+1 (binding) Thanks for working on this FLIP. Best regards, Timo On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes adding BundledAggregateFunction as an interface that aggregate function UDFs can implement. The interface exposes a batc