+1 (binding)

Op ma 24 feb 2025 om 11:06 schreef Stefan Richter <srich...@apache.org>

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
> On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Fabian
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for working on this FLIP.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Timo
> > >
> > > On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes
> > > > adding BundledAggregateFunction as an interface that aggregate
> function
> > > > UDFs can implement. The interface exposes a batch method which should
> > > make
> > > > calling out to external services more efficient, whether fetching
> data or
> > > > doing remote procedure calls to execute the function.  The FLIP has
> been
> > > > discussed in this thread [2].
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a vote.  The vote will be open for at least 72
> > > hours
> > > > unless there is an objection or insufficient votes.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-491%3A+BundledAggregateFunction+for+batched+aggregation
> > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/gx9p8wh4yxfrdk73wwqzh6sdkxgqwwrf
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to