+1 (binding) Op ma 24 feb 2025 om 11:06 schreef Stefan Richter <srich...@apache.org>
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Stefan > > On 2025/02/24 14:15:09 Fabian Hüske wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you, > > Fabian > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:32 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks for working on this FLIP. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Timo > > > > > > On 14.02.25 22:32, Alan Sheinberg wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-491 [1]. It proposes > > > > adding BundledAggregateFunction as an interface that aggregate > function > > > > UDFs can implement. The interface exposes a batch method which should > > > make > > > > calling out to external services more efficient, whether fetching > data or > > > > doing remote procedure calls to execute the function. The FLIP has > been > > > > discussed in this thread [2]. > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 > > > hours > > > > unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-491%3A+BundledAggregateFunction+for+batched+aggregation > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/gx9p8wh4yxfrdk73wwqzh6sdkxgqwwrf > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > >