Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-19 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi everyone, The vote has passed already, as you can see in the result thread [1] Regarding mentioning continued support of graph processing, feel free to comment on the open PR on flink-web [2] on this. Thanks, Martijn [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ng5t85t1lnmzrld4vvlk0mglq3fcgj50 [2] h

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-19 Thread Jing Ge
+1 and I second Yu Li and Yun Gao. It should be also pointed out that Flink will continue to support graph processing with a new plan in the upcoming 1.17 release notes which includes the change of dropping Gelly in order to let more developers and users be aware of it. Best regards, Jing On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-19 Thread David Anderson
+1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:59 PM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a long > time ago but never put to a vote [1]. > > Voting will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Best regards, > > Martijn > https://twitter.com/Marti

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-18 Thread Yuan Mei
+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:49 AM Dong Lin wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:59 AM Martijn Visser > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a > long > > time ago but never put to a vote [1]. > > > > Voting will be open for

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-17 Thread Dong Lin
+1 On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:59 AM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a long > time ago but never put to a vote [1]. > > Voting will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Best regards, > > Martijn > https://twitter.com/Martij

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-17 Thread Yun Tang
[1] https://github.com/vasia/gelly-streaming Best Yun Tang From: Sergey Nuyanzin Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 14:19 To: dev@flink.apache.org ; Yun Gao Subject: Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:50 AM Yun Gao wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-16 Thread Sergey Nuyanzin
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:50 AM Yun Gao wrote: > Hi Yu, > Very thanks for the suggestions and I also strongly > agree with that. Perhaps we could update the Gelly > documentation pages to also express the information. > Best, > Yun Gao > -

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-16 Thread Yun Gao
Hi Yu, Very thanks for the suggestions and I also strongly agree with that. Perhaps we could update the Gelly documentation pages to also express the information. Best, Yun Gao -- From:Yu Li Send Time:2022 Oct. 16 (Sun.) 18:30 To:de

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-16 Thread Yu Li
+1 Thanks for the clarification Martijn and Yun. Hopefully we can document somewhere that there is a plan (maybe long term) to introduce a replacement based on the new iteration framework introduced in flink-ml (based on DataStream API) after dropping the old Gelly library, and let our users know

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-13 Thread Maximilian Michels
+1 On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:00 PM Konstantin Knauf wrote: > +1 > > Am Do., 13. Okt. 2022 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Niels Basjes : > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:00 PM Martijn Visser < > martijnvis...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I would like to open a vote

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
+1 Am Do., 13. Okt. 2022 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Niels Basjes : > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:00 PM Martijn Visser > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a > long > > time ago but never put to a vote [1]. > > > > Voting will be

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-13 Thread Niels Basjes
+1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:00 PM Martijn Visser wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a long > time ago but never put to a vote [1]. > > Voting will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Best regards, > > Martijn > https://twitter.com/Marti

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-13 Thread Yun Gao
Hi all, For the successor of the Gelly library, currently in flink-ml we have already implemented a new iteration framework based on the DataStream API, which is necessary for a graph processing framework. It could also provide abilities like allowing for arbitrary states across rounds and async

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-13 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi Yu, The vote is for option 1, remove all code and documentation of Gelly. For the current users, they can stay on a previous version of Flink which still contains Gelly. Since Gelly (and the DataSet API) haven't been touched in multiple releases, there's most likely no need for them to upgrade

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-12 Thread Yu Li
Hi Martijn, >From the last replies of the previous discussion, I could see there are still users using Gelly that expressed their wish to somehow keep this module [1] [2] [3]. Therefore, Before giving my vote, I'd like to confirm what "Drop Gelly" exactly means. Does it mean that 1) we remove the

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-12 Thread Gyula Fóra
+1 On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 04:56, Yun Gao wrote: > +1 > Best, > Yun Gao > -- > From:Martijn Visser > Send Time:2022 Oct. 13 (Thu.) 04:59 > To:dev > Subject:[VOTE] Drop Gelly > Hi everyone, > I would like to open a vote for dropping

Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly

2022-10-12 Thread Yun Gao
+1 Best, Yun Gao -- From:Martijn Visser Send Time:2022 Oct. 13 (Thu.) 04:59 To:dev Subject:[VOTE] Drop Gelly Hi everyone, I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a long time ago but never put to a vote [1]