Hi Yu,
Very thanks for the suggestions and I also strongly
agree with that. Perhaps we could update the Gelly
documentation pages to also express the information.
Best,
Yun Gao
------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
Send Time:2022 Oct. 16 (Sun.) 18:30
To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Drop Gelly
+1
Thanks for the clarification Martijn and Yun. Hopefully we can document
somewhere that there is a plan (maybe long term) to introduce a replacement
based on the new iteration framework introduced in flink-ml (based on
DataStream API) after dropping the old Gelly library, and let our users
know that they could either use the old one, or join the community efforts
to build up the new one.
Personally I hope that we are not delivering a message that Flink won't
support graph processing anymore, unless this is exactly what we mean.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 21:42, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:00 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am Do., 13. Okt. 2022 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl
> >:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:00 PM Martijn Visser <
> > martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to open a vote for dropping Gelly, which was discussed a
> > > long
> > > > time ago but never put to a vote [1].
> > > >
> > > > Voting will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martijn
> > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82
> > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2m6wtgjvxcogbf9d5q7mqt4ofqjf2ojc
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > >
> > > Niels Basjes
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > https://twitter.com/snntrable
> > https://github.com/knaufk
> >
>
