Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-04-10 Thread Leonard Xu
/FLINK/Time-based+releases >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:14 AM David Radley >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi , >>>> I am wondering what the thinking is about calling the next release 2.1 >>>> rather th

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-04-10 Thread Ron Liu
4 AM David Radley >> wrote: >> >> > Hi , >> > I am wondering what the thinking is about calling the next release 2.1 >> > rather than 2.0.1. This numbering implies to me you are considering a >> > minor release rather than a point release. For ex

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-03-25 Thread Xintong Song
versioning.html, > > Kind regards, David. > > > From: Jark Wu > Date: Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 06:52 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1 > Thanks, Ron Liu for kicking off the 2.1 release. > > +1 for Ron Liu to be the rele

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-03-25 Thread Ron Liu
se rather than a point release. For example > > https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html, > > > > Kind regards, David. > > > > > > From: Jark Wu > > Date: Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 06:52 > > To: dev@flink.apache.o

RE: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-03-25 Thread David Radley
regards, David. From: Jark Wu Date: Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 06:52 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1 Thanks, Ron Liu for kicking off the 2.1 release. +1 for Ron Liu to be the release manager and +1 for the feature freeze date Best, Jark On Mon, 24

Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1

2025-03-25 Thread Jark Wu
Thanks, Ron Liu for kicking off the 2.1 release. +1 for Ron Liu to be the release manager and +1 for the feature freeze date Best, Jark On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 16:33, Ron Liu wrote: > Hi everyone, > With the release announcement of Flink 2.0, it's a good time to kick off > discussion of the nex