Hi ,
I am wondering what the thinking is about calling the next release 2.1 rather 
than 2.0.1.  This numbering implies to me you are considering a minor release 
rather than a point release. For example   
https://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html,

                                Kind regards, David.


From: Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 06:52
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Planning Flink 2.1
Thanks, Ron Liu for kicking off the 2.1 release.

+1 for Ron Liu to be the release manager and
+1 for the feature freeze date

Best,
Jark

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 16:33, Ron Liu <ron9....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> With the release announcement of Flink 2.0, it's a good time to kick off
> discussion of the next release 2.1.
>
> - Release Managers
>
> I'd like to volunteer as one of the release managers this time. It has been
> good practice to have a team of release managers from different
> backgrounds, so please raise you hand if you'd like to volunteer and get
> involved.
>
>
> - Timeline
>
> Flink 2.0 has been released. With a target release cycle of 4 months,
> we propose a feature freeze date of *June 21, 2025*.
>
>
> - Collecting Features
>
> As usual, we've created a wiki page[1] for collecting new features in 2.1.
>
> In the meantime, the release management team will be finalized in the next
> few days, and we'll continue to create Jira Boards and Sync meetings
> to make it easy for everyone to get an overview and track progress.
>
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.1+Release
>

Unless otherwise stated above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, 
Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN

Reply via email to