Thanks for the comments! I will open the voting thread later today!.
Best,
Piotrek
śr., 4 gru 2024 o 22:56 Roman Khachatryan napisał(a):
> Thanks for updating the FLIP and clarifying.
>
> > That might have been a good idea, however this is consistent with the
> ? already pre-existing traces/`Sp
Thanks for updating the FLIP and clarifying.
> That might have been a good idea, however this is consistent with the
? already pre-existing traces/`SpanBuilder`.
> I'm not sure what you would propose in this context? Make those two places
> inconsistent?
Good point, I think consistency is more im
Hi Roman!
> 1. Should it list the events that would be emitted in the first version?
> If not as part of the proposed change, then maybe as examples
I've added a brief list of events that will be added in the first version.
> 2. Interface Event - Scope
> It's scope is explicitly tied to a Class
Hi Piotr, thanks for the proposal!
I think this would be a very valuable addition to Flink as it would
simplify operations a lot
(disclaimer: we already use it in our internal Flink version)
I have a couple of remarks regarding the FLIP:
1. Should it list the events that would be emitted in the
