but you said you have a look at this,
>
>Kind regards, David,
>
>
> From: Lajith Koova
> Date: Monday, 13 May 2024 at 10:29
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Discussion: Condition field in the CR status
> Thanks for the feedback Jeyhun.
>
&g
g
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Discussion: Condition field in the CR status
Thanks for the feedback Jeyhun.
Regarding Will the usage of Conditions be enabled by default? Or will there
be any
disadvantages for Flink users . Yes the conditions will be enabled by
default for the CR.
You are right , when
Thanks for the feedback Jeyhun.
Regarding Will the usage of Conditions be enabled by default? Or will there
be any
disadvantages for Flink users . Yes the conditions will be enabled by
default for the CR.
You are right , when there are multiple conditions of the same type,
approach is we will
Thanks for the feedback Gyula. I have updated a couple of samples with
proposed conditions.
Thanks
Lajith K
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 12:24 PM Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hi Lajith!
>
> Can you please include some examples in the document to help reviewers?
> Just some examples with the status and the pro
Hi Lajith,
Thanks a lot for driving this FLIP. Please find my comments below:
- I echo Gyula that including some examples and further explanations might
ease reader's work. With the current version, the FLIP is a bit hard to
follow.
- Will the usage of Conditions be enabled by default? Or will t
Hi Lajith!
Can you please include some examples in the document to help reviewers?
Just some examples with the status and the proposed conditions.
Cheers,
Gyula
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 9:06 AM Lajith Koova wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Starting discussion thread here to discuss a proposal to add Condit
