il 2025 at 15:18
> To: David Radley , dev@flink.apache.org <
> dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for this. I could not find information about flinkbot, so I feel I
> am missing important pieces in FLI
/display/FLINK/FLIP-518%3A+Introduce+a+community+review+process
From: Sebastien Pereira
Date: Tuesday, 15 April 2025 at 15:18
To: David Radley , dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process
Hi David,
Thanks for this. I could not find information
probably worth doing on a project basis as well to get project wide
> insights as to what might be working well.
>
> Kind regards, David
>
> From: Robert Metzger
> Date: Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 08:45
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-
Hi David,
Thanks for this. I could not find information about flinkbot, so I feel I am
missing important pieces in FLIP-518 [1]. Is it an automated process that runs
regularly and take actions given some rules, or is it a tool that is manually
triggered?
If I am not mistaken, once a label is a
: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-518: Introduce a community review process
Thanks for the FLIP.
In the benefits section, you are mentioning:
- community reviewing then becomes a respected way to contribute to
Flink on the road to becoming a committer. So, it is in the contributor’s
interest to
Thanks for the FLIP.
In the benefits section, you are mentioning:
- community reviewing then becomes a respected way to contribute to
Flink on the road to becoming a committer. So, it is in the contributor’s
interest to review.
Another benefit related to this is that it is easier for
Yep, ship it.
I don’t see any harm on start following the suggested process since it only
adds a few labels to the existing PRs.
We could learn more by time and improve the process on the way.
QQ. Do the proposed flinkbot commands work already?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 15:32, David Radley wrote:
