[jira] [Created] (FLINK-36946) optimize sink operator name truncate

2024-12-20 Thread tartarus (Jira)
tartarus created FLINK-36946: Summary: optimize sink operator name truncate Key: FLINK-36946 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36946 Project: Flink Issue Type: Improvement

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-29 Thread Gabor Somogyi
y Lan (binding) - Rui Fan (binding) - Yun Tang (binding) There were no votes against it. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-474%3A+Store+operator+name+and+UID+in+state+metadata BR, G

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Yun Tang
+1(binding) Hopes the big picture could involve the SQL operators. Best Yun Tang From: Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 11:04 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metada

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Rui Fan
> > > From: Peter Huang > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 7:29:12 AM > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state > metadata > > > > +1 (Non binding) &g

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Zakelly Lan
e.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata > > +1 (Non binding) > > > Peter Huang > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 6:49 AM Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Gyula > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fer

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Zakelly Lan
r we provide a tool to list those > >> > > metadata. > >> > > > My > >> > > > > thoughts is to provide a complete solution instead of adding one > >> or > >> > two > >> > > > > specific data alongside the che

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread clara xiong
+1( non binding) Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Peter Huang Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 7:29:12 AM To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata +1 (Non binding) Peter Huang

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Peter Huang
; > > > > Thanks for clarifying the big picture [1], that helps a lot. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Du1-TShoOjaNDCahs3sgLWIpYkXzJPdSkgHcWLpELyw/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:02 

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Őrhidi Mátyás
; > > > > Thanks for clarifying the big picture [1], that helps a lot. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Du1-TShoOjaNDCahs3sgLWIpYkXzJPdSkgHcWLpELyw/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:02 AM Gabor Somogyi > gab

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Gyula Fóra
g > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:02 AM Gabor Somogyi gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID > in > > > state metadata [1]. > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Ferenc Csaky
gt; > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Du1-TShoOjaNDCahs3sgLWIpYkXzJPdSkgHcWLpELyw/edit?usp=sharing > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:02 AM Gabor Somogyi gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to start a vote on FLIP-474: Store

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Márton Balassi
74: Store operator name and UID in > state metadata [1]. > The discussion thread can be found here [2]. > > During the discussion a clear need formed to have an umbrella document > about the global view > which manifested in Flink state observability umbrella [3]. > > The vote w

[VOTE] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Hi All, I would like to start a vote on FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata [1]. The discussion thread can be found here [2]. During the discussion a clear need formed to have an umbrella document about the global view which manifested in Flink state observability umbrella [3

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-26 Thread Gabor Somogyi
gt; the >> > > > > current issue you are facing, here's my idea: If you could get >> access >> > > to >> > > > > the web UI, you can get the hash (vertex id) in the url by >> clicking >> > and >> > > > > zooming in on th

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-18 Thread Gabor Somogyi
> > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Zakelly > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:03 PM Gabor Somogyi < > > > gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-10 Thread Zakelly Lan
ow. > > > > > > > > > > Up until now our state processor API was good enough but now we're > > > > lagging > > > > > behind. We see users (just like Spark) where the first class > citizen > > is > > > > the > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-09 Thread Gabor Somogyi
that there are cases where users are not > able > > to > > > > identify operators because hash is a one way conversion. > > > > I'm open to any suggestion but somehow the initial operator human > > > readable > > > > identifier must b

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-09 Thread David Morávek
doesn't > know > > > what they set when debugging? > > > > > > There are cases where the user is setting the UID in the job, such case > > > it's not user friendly to parse git repos but doable. > > > But there are cases where the user h

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-09 Thread Gabor Somogyi
user friendly to parse git repos but doable. > > But there are cases where the user has limited or no control related > UIDs: > > * SQL jobs are generating operators with meaningful names, but I think > it's > > not realistic to enforce users to understand all the internals o

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-09 Thread Zakelly Lan
rce users to understand all the internals of Flink SQL > implementation (which operator named where and how). > * Iceberg is using the given UID as prefix and generating more operators > with it > * Weak justification but exists: Since operator name and UID are both > optional som

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-08 Thread Gabor Somogyi
ators with it * Weak justification but exists: Since operator name and UID are both optional some of the users are setting name only. Such case Flink generates a random hash, where only name can give some pointers. Hope I've given better context. [1] https://www.databricks.com/blog/anno

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-08 Thread Márton Balassi
> Regarding the checkpoint, it is not designed to be self-contained or > human-readable. I suggest not introducing such columns for debugging > purposes. > > > Best, > Zakelly > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 10:07 PM Gabor Somogyi > wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-08 Thread Zakelly Lan
ng such columns for debugging purposes. Best, Zakelly On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 10:07 PM Gabor Somogyi wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID > in state metadata[1]. > > In short users are interested in what kind of operato

[DISCUSS] FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-07 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Hi Devs, I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-474: Store operator name and UID in state metadata[1]. In short users are interested in what kind of operators are inside a checkpoint data which can be enhanced from user experience perspective. The details can be found in FLIP-474[1]. Please

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-36001) Store operator name and UID in state metadata

2024-08-07 Thread Gabor Somogyi (Jira)
Gabor Somogyi created FLINK-36001: - Summary: Store operator name and UID in state metadata Key: FLINK-36001 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36001 Project: Flink Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-31808) wrong examples of how to set operator name in documents

2023-04-14 Thread Weihua Hu (Jira)
Weihua Hu created FLINK-31808: - Summary: wrong examples of how to set operator name in documents Key: FLINK-31808 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31808 Project: Flink Issue

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-25070) FLIP-195: Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-26 Thread Wenlong Lyu (Jira)
Wenlong Lyu created FLINK-25070: --- Summary: FLIP-195: Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job Key: FLINK-25070 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25070 Project

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-26 Thread wenlong.lwl
! > > Best, > Yun-- > Sender:Xianxun Ye > Date:2021/11/24 16:49:44 > Recipient:dev@flink.apache.org > Theme:[VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and > operator name for job > > +1 (no

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-25 Thread Yun Gao
+1 (binding). Very thanks Wenlong for the proposal! Best, Yun-- Sender:Xianxun Ye Date:2021/11/24 16:49:44 Recipient:dev@flink.apache.org Theme:[VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

[VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-24 Thread Xianxun Ye
] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job Best, Wenlong Lyu -- Best regards, Sergey

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-24 Thread Yangze Guo
; > > > > > > > would > > > > > like > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > start a vote on FLIP-195 [2]. > > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) > > > unless > > > > > > > > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Sergey > >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Yun Tang
> start a vote on FLIP-195 [2]. > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) > > unless > > > > > > > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Sergey Nuyanzin
t; > > > to > > > > > > start a vote on FLIP-195 [2]. > > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) > unless > > > > > > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, Sergey

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread godfrey he
gt; like > > > to > > > > > start a vote on FLIP-195 [2]. > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) unless > > > > > there is an

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Lijie Wang
ike > > > to > > > > > start a vote on FLIP-195 [2]. > > > > > Thanks for all of your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) > unless > > > > > there is an obje

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Jark Wu
16:00 GMT) unless > > > > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Jing Zhang
(Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) unless > > > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > > > Best, > > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Martijn Visser
t > > [2] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > > > Best, > > Wenlong Lyu > > >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Aitozi
s (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) unless > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > > Best, > Wenlong Lyu >

Re: [VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Terry Wang
; The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Nov 26th 16:00 GMT) unless > there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+str

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread Yun Gao
Hi, Very thanks Wenlong for the update! Also +1 for the proposal~ Best, Yun Gao -- From:Yun Gao Send Time:2021 Nov. 23 (Tue.) 16:09 To:dev Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name

[VOTE][FLIP-195] Improve the name and structure of vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-23 Thread wenlong.lwl
/thread/kvdxr8db0l5s6wk7hwlt0go5fms99b8t [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job Best, Wenlong Lyu

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-22 Thread Yun Tang
org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job > to > add a prefix [vertex-idx] for vertex name. please checkout to see whether > you have more comments, thanks. > > Add a prefix [vertex-idx] for vertex name, so that we can

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-21 Thread wenlong.lwl
Hi, Yun Gao, Yun Tang, and Aitozi, thanks for the suggestion again, I have added following section in proposed changes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+job to add a prefix [vertex-idx] for vertex name

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-21 Thread Yun Gao
Hi, Very thanks Wenlong for bringing up this issue and very thanks for the warm discussion! Big +1 to improve the name and structure of job vertex for it make the life of the developers much easier and shorten the operator name would saves a lot of money for reducing the amount of logs to

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-21 Thread Aitozi
ncise > > enough, we can get the vertex id easily. > > Does anyone have some comments on this? > > > > > > Best, > > Wenlong Lyu > > > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 19:03, Yun Tang wrote: > > > > > Hi Wenlong, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-20 Thread 刘建刚
eve many guys have ever > > suffered from the long and unreadable operator name for long time. > > > > I have another suggestion which inspired by Aitozi, that we could add > some > > hint to tell the vertex index. Such as make the pipeline from "source -->

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-19 Thread wenlong.lwl
wrote: > Hi Wenlong, > > Thanks for bringing up this discussion and I believe many guys have ever > suffered from the long and unreadable operator name for long time. > > I have another suggestion which inspired by Aitozi, that we could add some > hint to tell the vertex in

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-18 Thread Yun Tang
Hi Wenlong, Thanks for bringing up this discussion and I believe many guys have ever suffered from the long and unreadable operator name for long time. I have another suggestion which inspired by Aitozi, that we could add some hint to tell the vertex index. Such as make the pipeline from

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread godfrey he
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 19:14, Chesnay Schepler > > wrote: > > > > > > > Why should this be specific to the table API? The datastream API has > > > > similar issues with long operator names (like windowing). > > > > > > > > On 16/11/2021 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread wenlong.lwl
hesnay Schepler > wrote: > > > > > Why should this be specific to the table API? The datastream API has > > > similar issues with long operator names (like windowing). > > > > > > On 16/11/2021 11:22, wenlong.lwl wrote: > > > > Thank

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
API has > > similar issues with long operator names (like windowing). > > > > On 16/11/2021 11:22, wenlong.lwl wrote: > > > Thanks Godfrey for the suggestion. > > > Regarding 1, how about table.optimizer.simplify-operator-name-enabled, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread wenlong.lwl
wenlong.lwl wrote: > > Thanks Godfrey for the suggestion. > > Regarding 1, how about table.optimizer.simplify-operator-name-enabled, > > which means that we would simplify the name of operator and keep the > > details in description only. > > "table.optimizer.oper

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread Chesnay Schepler
Why should this be specific to the table API? The datastream API has similar issues with long operator names (like windowing). On 16/11/2021 11:22, wenlong.lwl wrote: Thanks Godfrey for the suggestion. Regarding 1, how about table.optimizer.simplify-operator-name-enabled, which means that we

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread wenlong.lwl
Thanks Godfrey for the suggestion. Regarding 1, how about table.optimizer.simplify-operator-name-enabled, which means that we would simplify the name of operator and keep the details in description only. "table.optimizer.operator-name.description-enabled" can not describe what it mea

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread godfrey he
Thanks for creating this FLIP Wenlong. The FLIP already looks pretty solid, I think the config options can be improved a little: 1) about table.optimizer.separate-name-and-description, I think "operator-name" should be considered in the option, how about table.optimizer.operator-name.d

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-15 Thread wenlong.lwl
Hi, all, FYI the FLIP doc has been created : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-195%3A+Improve+the+name+and+structure+of+vertex+and+operator+name+for+sql+job Best, Wenlong On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 11:41, wenlong.lwl wrote: > Hi all, > Thanks for the feedback, It seem

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-14 Thread wenlong.lwl
Hi all, Thanks for the feedback, It seems that the proposal is accepted by all of you guys. I will prepare a formal FLIP document and then go ahead to the vote stage. If any one has any other comments or suggestions, please let me know, thanks. Best, Wenlong On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 05:54, Neng Lu

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Neng Lu
+1 (non-binding) This change will really help to ease developer life. On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 6:33 AM Guowei Ma wrote: > +1 > This would be very helpful for our debugging online job. > > Best, > Guowei > > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:03 PM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > > > +1. It's useful to understand

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Guowei Ma
+1 This would be very helpful for our debugging online job. Best, Guowei On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:03 PM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > +1. It's useful to understand the job topology. > Looking forward to this feature. > Best, > Yuepeng Pan. > > > > > > > At 2021-11-11 19:44:44, "Yangze Guo" wrote: > >

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Yuepeng Pan
+1. It's useful to understand the job topology. Looking forward to this feature. Best, Yuepeng Pan. At 2021-11-11 19:44:44, "Yangze Guo" wrote: >+1. That's gonna help a lot for debugging. > >Best, >Yangze Guo > >On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:37 PM Till Rohrmann wrote: >> >> This improvement loo

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Yangze Guo
+1. That's gonna help a lot for debugging. Best, Yangze Guo On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:37 PM Till Rohrmann wrote: > > This improvement looks like it makes the life of our users a lot easier > when it comes to understanding logs and reading the UI. Hence +1. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Nov 11,

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Till Rohrmann
This improvement looks like it makes the life of our users a lot easier when it comes to understanding logs and reading the UI. Hence +1. Cheers, Till On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:59 AM JING ZHANG wrote: > Big +1. > > This is a problem frequently encountered in our production platform, look > for

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread JING ZHANG
Big +1. This is a problem frequently encountered in our production platform, look forward to this improvement. Best, Jing Zhang Martijn Visser 于2021年11月11日周四 下午6:26写道: > +1. Looks much better now > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 11:07, godfrey he wrote: > > > Thanks for driving this, this improveme

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Martijn Visser
+1. Looks much better now On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 11:07, godfrey he wrote: > Thanks for driving this, this improvement solves a long-complained > problem, +1 > > Best, > Godfrey > > Jark Wu 于2021年11月11日周四 下午5:40写道: > > > > +1 for this. It looks much more clear and structured. > > > > Best, > > J

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread godfrey he
Thanks for driving this, this improvement solves a long-complained problem, +1 Best, Godfrey Jark Wu 于2021年11月11日周四 下午5:40写道: > > +1 for this. It looks much more clear and structured. > > Best, > Jark > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > > > I'm generally in favor of it,

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Jark Wu
+1 for this. It looks much more clear and structured. Best, Jark On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > I'm generally in favor of it, and there are already tickets that > proposed a dedicated operator/vertex description: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20388 > h

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread Chesnay Schepler
I'm generally in favor of it, and there are already tickets that proposed a dedicated operator/vertex description: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20388 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21858 On 11/11/2021 10:02, wenlong.lwl wrote: Hi, all, I would like to start a discus

[DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-11 Thread wenlong.lwl
Hi, all, I would like to start a discussion about an improvement on name and structure of job vertex name, mainly to improve experience of debugging and analyzing sql job at runtime. the main proposed changes including: 1. separate description and name for operator, so that we can have detailed in

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-24376) Operator name in OperatorCoordinator should not use chained name

2021-09-26 Thread Qingsheng Ren (Jira)
Qingsheng Ren created FLINK-24376: - Summary: Operator name in OperatorCoordinator should not use chained name Key: FLINK-24376 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24376 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-22162) Make Max Operator name Length Configurable

2021-04-08 Thread Lu Niu (Jira)
Lu Niu created FLINK-22162: -- Summary: Make Max Operator name Length Configurable Key: FLINK-22162 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22162 Project: Flink Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-20368) Supports custom operator name for Flink SQL

2020-11-26 Thread Danny Chen (Jira)
Danny Chen created FLINK-20368: -- Summary: Supports custom operator name for Flink SQL Key: FLINK-20368 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20368 Project: Flink Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-19468) Metrics not returned when data stream / operator name contains "+"

2020-09-29 Thread Boyang Jerry Peng (Jira)
Boyang Jerry Peng created FLINK-19468: - Summary: Metrics not returned when data stream / operator name contains "+" Key: FLINK-19468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19468

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-18846) Set a meaningful operator name for the filesystem sink

2020-08-06 Thread Jark Wu (Jira)
Jark Wu created FLINK-18846: --- Summary: Set a meaningful operator name for the filesystem sink Key: FLINK-18846 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18846 Project: Flink Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-18443) The operator name select: (ip, ts, count, environment.access AS access, environment.brand AS brand, sid, params.adid AS adid, eventid) exceeded the 80 characters length

2020-06-28 Thread mzz (Jira)
mzz created FLINK-18443: --- Summary: The operator name select: (ip, ts, count, environment.access AS access, environment.brand AS brand, sid, params.adid AS adid, eventid) exceeded the 80 characters length limit and was truncated Key: FLINK

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-16372) Generate unique operator name

2020-03-02 Thread Zou (Jira)
Zou created FLINK-16372: --- Summary: Generate unique operator name Key: FLINK-16372 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16372 Project: Flink Issue Type: Improvement Reporter

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-11212) operator metric key can repalce operator name by operator id

2018-12-24 Thread lining (JIRA)
lining created FLINK-11212: -- Summary: operator metric key can repalce operator name by operator id Key: FLINK-11212 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11212 Project: Flink Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-10021) All-round E2E tests query metric with wrong operator name

2018-08-02 Thread Chesnay Schepler (JIRA)
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-10021: Summary: All-round E2E tests query metric with wrong operator name Key: FLINK-10021 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10021 Project: Flink

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9653) Add operator name to latency metrics

2018-06-24 Thread Julian Stephen (JIRA)
Julian Stephen created FLINK-9653: - Summary: Add operator name to latency metrics Key: FLINK-9653 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9653 Project: Flink Issue Type: New Feature

Operator name

2017-05-12 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
Hi to all, in many of my Flink job it is helpful to give a name to operators in order to make JobManager UI simpler to read. Currently, to give a name to operators it is necessary to specify it of the operator everytime it is used, for example: - env.readAsCsv().map().name("My map function") W

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-4875) operator name not correctly inferred

2016-10-21 Thread Chesnay Schepler (JIRA)
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-4875: --- Summary: operator name not correctly inferred Key: FLINK-4875 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4875 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug