+1 This would be very helpful for our debugging online job. Best, Guowei
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:03 PM Yuepeng Pan <flin...@126.com> wrote: > +1. It's useful to understand the job topology. > Looking forward to this feature. > Best, > Yuepeng Pan. > > > > > > > At 2021-11-11 19:44:44, "Yangze Guo" <karma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >+1. That's gonna help a lot for debugging. > > > >Best, > >Yangze Guo > > > >On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:37 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> This improvement looks like it makes the life of our users a lot easier > >> when it comes to understanding logs and reading the UI. Hence +1. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:59 AM JING ZHANG <beyond1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Big +1. > >> > > >> > This is a problem frequently encountered in our production platform, > look > >> > forward to this improvement. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Jing Zhang > >> > > >> > Martijn Visser <mart...@ververica.com> 于2021年11月11日周四 下午6:26写道： > >> > > >> > > +1. Looks much better now > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 11:07, godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for driving this, this improvement solves a long-complained > >> > > > problem, +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > Best, > >> > > > Godfrey > >> > > > > >> > > > Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月11日周四 下午5:40写道： > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 for this. It looks much more clear and structured. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Best, > >> > > > > Jark > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Chesnay Schepler < > ches...@apache.org> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm generally in favor of it, and there are already tickets > that > >> > > > > > proposed a dedicated operator/vertex description: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20388 > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21858 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 11/11/2021 10:02, wenlong.lwl wrote: > >> > > > > > > Hi, all, I would like to start a discussion about an > improvement > >> > on > >> > > > name > >> > > > > > > and structure of job vertex name, mainly to improve > experience of > >> > > > > > debugging > >> > > > > > > and analyzing sql job at runtime. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > the main proposed changes including: > >> > > > > > > 1. separate description and name for operator, so that we > can > >> > have > >> > > > > > detailed > >> > > > > > > info at description and shorter name, which could be more > >> > friendly > >> > > > for > >> > > > > > > external systems like logging/metrics without losing useful > >> > > > information. > >> > > > > > > 2. introduce a tree-mode vertex description which can make > the > >> > > > > > description > >> > > > > > > more readable and easier to understand > >> > > > > > > 3. clean up and improve description for sql operator > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > here is an example with the changes for a sql job: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > vertex name: > >> > > > > > > GlobalGroupAggregate[52] -> (Calc[53] -> > NotNullEnforcer[54] -> > >> > > Sink: > >> > > > > > > tb_ads_dwi_pub_hbd_spm_dtr_002_003[54], Calc[55] -> > >> > > > NotNullEnforcer[56] > >> > > > > > -> > >> > > > > > > Sink: tb_ads_dwi_pub_hbd_spm_dtr_002_004[56]) > >> > > > > > > vertex description: > >> > > > > > > [52]:GlobalGroupAggregate(groupBy=[stat_date, spm_url_ab, > >> > client], > >> > > > > > > select=[stat_date, spm_url_ab, client, COUNT(count1$0) AS > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_mtr_001, COUNT(distinct$0 count$1) AS > >> > > clk_uv_app_mtr_001, > >> > > > > > > COUNT(count1$2) AS clk_cnt_app_mtr_002, COUNT(distinct$0 > count$3) > >> > > AS > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_mtr_002, COUNT(count1$4) AS clk_cnt_app_mtr_003, > >> > > > > > > COUNT(distinct$0 count$5) AS clk_uv_app_mtr_003]) :- > >> > > > > > > [53]:Calc(select=[CASE((client <> ''), CONCAT_WS('\u0004', > >> > > > > > > CONCAT(SUBSTRING(MD5(CONCAT(spm_url_ab, '12345')), 1, 4), > >> > ':md5'), > >> > > > > > > CONCAT(spm_url_ab, ':spmab'), '12345:app', CONCAT(client, > >> > > ':client'), > >> > > > > > > CONCAT('ddd:', stat_date)), null:VARCHAR(2147483647)) AS > rowkey, > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_mtr_001 AS clk_cnt_app_dtr_001, > clk_uv_app_mtr_001 AS > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_dtr_001, clk_cnt_app_mtr_002 AS > clk_cnt_app_dtr_002, > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_mtr_002 AS clk_uv_app_dtr_002, > clk_cnt_app_mtr_003 AS > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_dtr_003, clk_uv_app_mtr_003 AS > clk_uv_app_dtr_003]) : > >> > > +- > >> > > > > > > [54]:NotNullEnforcer(fields=[rowkey]) : +- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > [54]:Sink(table=[default_catalog.default_database.tb_ads_dwi_pub_hbd_spm_dtr_002_003], > >> > > > > > > fields=[rowkey, clk_cnt_app_dtr_001, clk_uv_app_dtr_001, > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_dtr_002, clk_uv_app_dtr_002, > clk_cnt_app_dtr_003, > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_dtr_003]) +- [55]:Calc(select=[CASE((client <> > ''), > >> > > > > > > CONCAT_WS('\u0004', CONCAT(SUBSTRING(MD5(CONCAT(spm_url_ab, > >> > > > '12345')), 1, > >> > > > > > > 4), ':md5'), CONCAT(spm_url_ab, ':spmab'), '12345:app', > >> > > > CONCAT('ddd:', > >> > > > > > > stat_date), CONCAT(client, ':client')), (client = ''), > >> > > > > > CONCAT_WS('\u0004', > >> > > > > > > CONCAT(SUBSTRING(MD5(CONCAT(spm_url_ab, '92459')), 1, 4), > >> > ':md5'), > >> > > > > > > CONCAT(spm_url_ab, ':spmab'), '92459:app', CONCAT('ddd:', > >> > > > stat_date)), > >> > > > > > > null:VARCHAR(2147483647)) AS rowkey, clk_cnt_app_mtr_001 AS > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_dtr_001, clk_uv_app_mtr_001 AS > clk_uv_app_dtr_001, > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_mtr_002 AS clk_cnt_app_dtr_002, > clk_uv_app_mtr_002 AS > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_dtr_002, clk_cnt_app_mtr_003 AS > clk_cnt_app_dtr_003, > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_mtr_003 AS clk_uv_app_dtr_003]) +- > >> > > > > > > [56]:NotNullEnforcer(fields=[rowkey]) +- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > [56]:Sink(table=[default_catalog.default_database.tb_ads_dwi_pub_hbd_spm_dtr_002_004], > >> > > > > > > fields=[rowkey, clk_cnt_app_dtr_001, clk_uv_app_dtr_001, > >> > > > > > > clk_cnt_app_dtr_002, clk_uv_app_dtr_002, > clk_cnt_app_dtr_003, > >> > > > > > > clk_uv_app_dtr_003]) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > For more detail on the proposal: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VUVJeHY_We09GY53-K2lETP3HUNZG9wMKyecFWk_Wxk > >> > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VUVJeHY_We09GY53-K2lETP3HUNZG9wMKyecFWk_Wxk/edit# > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Looking forward to your feedback, thanks. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Bests > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Wenlong Lyu > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
